Dr. Breck intro

There's two reasons why I'm celibate.

1) My attitude and orientation. I border on asexual. I hardly get off on sex. I don't have much of a drive.
2) My current geolocation in the coal region in the middle of nowhere without the ability to drive a car.

If I relocated even to lancaster but especially to philadelphia and sought out partners, I could end my celibacy within a week to a month. A week to just have a one off, a month for a relationship.

I wouldn't even have to use the internet by the way, I would just go to areas adjacent to drug blocks. But then if I started using the internet I could get a relationship if I wanted to.

edit: I know what Breck's rebuttal will be. To "repeat himself."

Breck needs to work on his ideological purity before declaring himself the leader of GB. You can't be someone who constantly shoots people down for being lower class and call yourself a "Bolshevik." Half of Breck's rants are about social status, especially the ones you never saw in the FB group I dropped out of.

Breck's got a lot of issues.

I have another theory. You're stuck in age old feuds, but everyone else has gotten over it. Eventually they figured out I had gotten over it too, so they started to view me rationally. I'm still not quite baby face though, because I'm not in the shoutbox, but considering our past fueding, I'm doing pretty good. However, I admit the theory in the video is somewhat creative. I'm unaware of any phorians following my tiktok, but long ago flak "liked" one of my videos where I screamed in a tunnel. This took place before I rejoined.

Breck needs to interview Wodwo.

kanethenotorious said:

I have another theory. You're stuck in age old feuds, but everyone else has gotten over it. Eventually they figured out I had gotten over it too, so they started to view me rationally. I'm still not quite baby face though, because I'm not in the shoutbox, but considering our past fueding, I'm doing pretty good. However, I admit the theory in the video is somewhat creative. I'm unaware of any phorians following my tiktok, but long ago flak "liked" one of my videos where I screamed in a tunnel. This took place before I rejoined.

Click to expand...

Daryl is so far over with prowrastling fan Cole that even me breaking kayfabe won't set him back, lol.
Cole will be ordering kanes used jockstraps before long.

I remember that day that Dr Breck PM'd me and asked for my help recovering his claim against SI with Zed.

I responded, even-handedly, that 'forums' are 4 things: 1/ a DNS entry 2/ a web hosting arrangement 3/ the data being displayed at the website which is owned by someone and 4/ a license to the forum software -- and I asked him politely to explain what claims he was making and how they realated to those.

I don't think he understood what I was saying and that was fine. So I ignored the claim.

A man who cannot articulate what he wants in real world terms needs help, I think. There are plenty of people you can retain who will assist with such matters, and I don't work for free.

This is the old Roman attitude towards legal matters: Roman citizens know the law and how to manage their private affairs. It is only freedmen who insist on the patron/client arrangement, because they don't understand 'the system'. Therefore, either a sharecropper should consult with his former master (after being freed from slavery), or else 'retain a mouthpiece' for hire.

As a lord and master, I am willing to help my clients, as patron of course. But Breck is neither my freedman nor family.

This is just the Western Way -- and Patrick Henry would totally get my attitude here.

I also explained that it didn't matter what I did about websites. The host will always respect the owner of the credit card paying them, as far as #2 is concerned.

I do rather believe he took my 'lack of action' as a personal affront.

kanethenotorious said:

There's two reasons why I'm celibate.

1) My attitude and orientation. I border on asexual. I hardly get off on sex. I don't have much of a drive.
2) My current geolocation in the coal region in the middle of nowhere without the ability to drive a car.

If I relocated even to lancaster but especially to philadelphia and sought out partners, I could end my celibacy within a week to a month. A week to just have a one off, a month for a relationship.

I wouldn't even have to use the internet by the way, I would just go to areas adjacent to drug blocks. But then if I started using the internet I could get a relationship if I wanted to.

edit: I know what Breck's rebuttal will be. To "repeat himself."

Click to expand...

The subject is off-color but I will remind the readership that porn ling ism disqualifies one of celibacy, so ruralism isn’t a defining issue.

R Crowley the White said:

The subject is off-color but I will remind the readership that porn ling ism disqualifies one of celibacy, so ruralism isn’t a defining issue.

Click to expand...

Under rated topic. Also, most Boomer era persons consider anything other than missionary position with an actual woman to be 'Sodomy'. Which used to be illegal in many southern states. Dante put Masturbators and Sodomites in the same rung of Hell for a reason.

If you do that shit, you're gay in the 'OK, Boomer' sense end of story. If you touch yourself, you're doing a man, OK?

Macrobius said:

Under rated topic. Also, most Boomer era persons consider anything other than missionary position with an actual woman to be 'Sodomy'. Which used to be illegal in many southern states. Dante put Masturbators and Sodomites in the same rung of Hell for a reason.

If you do that shit, you're gay in the 'OK, Boomer' sense end of story. If you touch yourself, you're doing a man, OK?

Click to expand...

Lol. No I think that is a false equivalency. Pornlings are not faggots necessarily but they are not celibate. There is a certain honor to celibacy that should not be transgressed, in my opinion. The word that needs to be used in this context is asexual, for pornlings who never engage with another person

R Crowley the White said:

Lol. No I think that is a false equivalency. Pornlings are not faggots necessarily but they are not celibate. There is a certain honor to celibacy that should not be transgressed, in my opinion. The word that needs to be used in this context is asexual, for pornlings who never engage with another person

Click to expand...

I understand you are more liberal than the average Boomer, coming from where you do. I can give citations that what you say is in no way universal among Boomers and certainly not in the Southeast.

In Louisiana, it was illegal to kiss your wife's breast no matter what position you used, in living memory of our generation.

If you did that in the context of marriage, you could be convicted of Sodomy. Really.

Handmaid of Gideon isn't entirely unreal.

Macrobius said:

I understand you are more liberal than the average Boomer, coming from where you do. I can give citations that what you say is in no way universal among Boomers and certainly not in the Southeast.

In Louisiana, it was illegal to kiss your wife's breast no matter what position you used, in living memory of our generation.

If you did that in the context of marriage, you could be convicted of Sodomy. Really.

Handmaid of Gideon isn't entirely unreal.

Click to expand...

I was never arguing yay or nay to universality, so beside the point. But I doubt you will find a dictionary definition where homosexuality and masturbation are synonyms. Yes I know about the broad definition of sodomy but I’d rather doubt that even in the broad old definition of sodomy that masturbation would be included, but is possible. In any event the way the language works today that is not what masturbation means for 99% of humanity. Language is meant to communicate so if You were talking with people you would necessarily need to define your terms every time you use the word homosexuality as masturbation. Why? Just use the words the way people commonly understand them. You are a droplet, semantically speaking, in an ocean of people using words and are not going to change the meaning all by yourself. It is a conceit, which is harmless enough.

R Crowley the White said:

I was never arguing yay or nay to universality, so beside the point. But I doubt you will find a dictionary definition where homosexuality and masturbation are synonyms. Yes I know about the broad definition of sodomy but I’d rather doubt that even in the broad old definition of sodomy that masturbation would be included, but is possible. In any event the way the language works today that is not what masturbation means for 99% of humanity. Language is meant to communicate so if You were talking with people you would necessarily need to define your terms every time you use the word homosexuality as masturbation. Why? Just use the words the way people commonly understand them. You are a droplet, semantically speaking, in an ocean of people using words and are not going to change the meaning all by yourself. It is a conceit, which is harmless enough.

Click to expand...

LOL. Dictionaries. You mean the ones written by Noah Webster? Or the crankish kind boomers were subjected to by Deweyite Progressives. Thorndike-Barnhart.


Etymology is part of reality (just like genetics for language), also Law, and books don't matter in the least to either.

I'm willing to accept Sam Johnson's though.

Macrobius said:

LOL. Dictionaries. You mean the ones written by Noah Webster? Or the crankish kind boomers were subjected to by Deweyite Progressives. Thorndike-Barnhart.

Thorndike Barnhart intermediate dictionary : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

[20], 1072 pages : 26 cm

archive.org

Etymology is part of reality (just like genetics for language), also Law, and books don't matter in the least to either.

I'm willing to accept Sam Johnson's though.

Click to expand...

One is allowed on a casual forum to use language requiring constant defining of terms. It matters not, in the small or large scheme of things. Even here, where we are familiar with your idiosyncratic usage, we would still need clarification to understand which way you were using the term.

One could be alone in the deepest obscurity, on the mountaintop or buried in a clearing of the deep forest, and so long as one had a hard drive filled with schmorno, one could easily not be celibate. But why even a need for smut? one's imagination could destroy celibacy.

I will add, and the whole topic is off color, that practice of celibacy is a big help to meditation practice, as meditation experts have claimed forever, so far as religious practice goes.