Beta Males = "Alphas" to most people

[Lord Osmund de Ixabert]

It seems that most people have not the faintest inkling as to what a ‘beta male’ truly is. I trust that the following essayette will prove an illuminating endeavour, by dispelling the misconceptions that seem to abound regarding this particular subject.

The beta male holds a position of great prestige and regard within the male social order. He serves a distinctive rôle as the alpha’s trusty ally, standing at his side with unwavering support; his right-hand man, as it were.

Despite this, the beta male is commonly perceived as an alpha, in his own right, by the general population. He is never the sort of man that is perceived as effeminate. Women hold him in high regard, and find him desirable. He is capable of commanding the admiration of ordinary men, due to the very high status that he occupies within the male sociosexual order.

The display of disdain, or feigned contempt, for beta males, is indicative of one’s own inferior status as a gamma male. The gamma male, situated as he is at the bottom rung of the male sociosexual hierarchy, perceives himself as an alpha, yet is not seen as such by others, and no one wants him or his ilk to be in an alpha position.

The gamma therefore harbours a resentment towards beta males for the same reason he bears ill-will towards alphas,—he feels that everyone should treat him as the alpha, despite being perceived as such by no one; and beta males are commonly perceived as alphas, which only serves to inflame and accentuate the gamma's feelings of inadequacy.

In truth, the beta male dons the mantle of alpha, relative to the multitude of men, for he exhibits many of the qualities distinctive of alpha males; it is only in comparison to the rarest of specimens, the alpha himself, that the beta male falls short.

In these effete times, the alpha male is a true rarity. Most of the men that most people think of as ‘alphas’ are in all probability beta males with situational alpha propensities. (A position coveted by the gamma, but granted only to betas.)

Thus, in our society it falls upon the beta male to assume the mantle of the ‘alphas’ in the absence of true alpha males, and he becomes what is commonly referred to as a ‘situational alpha.’

Nevertheless, it must be acknowledged that he does not embody the inherent characteristics of the authentic alpha man. Still, he can and should take on the alpha rôle; otherwise the gamma, the lambda, or the Jew will take over.

Ixabert​

 

[Gawn Chippin]

...in the absence of true alpha males, and he becomes what is commonly referred to as a ‘situational alpha.’...​

I have at times met what I thought were situational lesbians. Most of them being of the passive type. I wonder if they choose this path, because of having had only disappointing sexual experiences with men.
The following is a classic example of a Beta Osmond:

 

[Lord Osmund de Ixabert]

The only thing that annoys me about your posts is the oversized images. If a moderator would please delete the images it would be appreciated.

 

[Gawn Chippin]

The images begin small. But seem to enlarge, once pasted. Pretty much like an automotive exterior rear view mirror in reverse.
Let's see how the following smaller image fares:

 

[Lord Osmund de Ixabert]

I will do you a favour. I resized it for you. If the images are so dreadfully important to you, then copy this BB code, replace the image above (the largest one) with it,

[img]https://i.postimg.cc/67JKdrqT/zzzzzzz.png[/img]

 

[Lord Osmund de Ixabert]

I have at times met what I thought were situational lesbians

Iʼm  af raid lesbians  do  not  exist,   &  no  amount  of  gratuitous imagery  is  going  to  prove  otherwise.

A lesbian is usu. a  woman  who  was  molested  by  her  father,  uncle,  &c. She consequently feels disgusted by men. She then confuses her awareness of objective female beauty, which all women have with regard to one another (due to the objective nature of beauty),—witih sexual attraction. On top of that, they confuse the feeling of friendship toward other woman with a sexuality, which it can never be. No matter how passionate the love, if itʼs between two members of the same sex it cannot be considered any kind of sexuality. Lastly, these individuals confuse mutual masturabtion, which is a perversion, with a form of sex in itself. Although, I have been told that many people of that persuasion regard themselves as ‘Platonic,’ i.e. they supposedly refrain from abusing each other's sex organs in this manner. The major  cause of the confusion,—hypersexualisation,  just as  Iʼve  explained to you before.    Everyone  is  oversexualised.

Ixabert​