"Cancel Culture" Thread

[kanethenotorious]

Feel free to use this thread to discuss people who are getting cancelled or to discuss the process of cancel culture.

Many (but not all) "extremists" know they are triggering people. If triggering people shows a giant network of resources and middlemen designed to shut down speech, then the triggering was successful. Such networks could then be turned and used against people simply for expressing classic left or right wing views. It may start out over topics that polite society has consensus on such as holocaust revisionism, but the resources are then available to shut down Alex Jones next, then Donald Trump ... the line can keep moving until the point where the line is simply hurting another person's feelings. As soon as the tools and mechanisms are available in the private sector to shut speech down, those tools can be used on people who comform to the rules but carefully conform with insufficient enthusiasm. I think the greatest thing political dissidents do is get the centralized private sector bureaucracy to expose its own existence. It's not about who is being shut down, it's about the fact that they have the ability and coordination to shut people down.

edit: At one point the movement against the Iraq war was subject to cancel culture.

 

[Gawn Chippin]

Cartoon charachters survive cancelling, through propagandist recycling:

 

[Lord Osmund de Ixabert]

Salutations, esteemed sir,

I should like first of all to convey my utmost admiration and respect for thy esteemed self. Permit me, therefore, in all humility, to put forth my modest assessment of the exposition presented in the original post, as I find it to be open to some criticisms.

In my modest judgment, the supposition that those who engage in 'triggering' behaviour ought to be designated as "extremists" is misguided & untenable. For there are innumerable reasons why men might engage in this conduct. Many are driv'n by the fervent desire to speak the truth, regardless of its unpopularity; yet others are driven only by ignorance and a deficit of compassion; whilst still others may harbour maleficent designs.

The assertion that the revelation of this network constitutes the paramount achievement of political dissidents is equally misguided, for it overlooks the injury that may be inflicted upon the individual by the 'triggering' behaviour itself. The notion that the act of triggering individuals is commendable in itself, inasmuch as it exposes the existence of a nefarious cabal plotting to abridge freedom of speech, is without merit. It must be confessed that any further restrictio oratio, at this point, regardless of the motive behind it, constitutes a perilous path which can only lead to the suppression of righteous dissension, & the dilution of fundamental liberties.

Finally, the notion that the private sector bureaucracy holds the power to stifle speech is a matter of grave alarm. This power ought not to be concentrated in the hands of tyrannical minority, but rather, 'tis imperative that we observe a delicate balance betwixt safeguarding liberty and counteracting attempts to incite public mischief. This can be effectiveliest achiev'd thro' free and lively public discourse & the enforcement of laws & regulations that defend the rights of individuals.

Adieu, and may thy path be graced with prosperity and felicity.
I remain, Sir, with heartfelt felicitations,
Ever faithful and dedicated,
Your most cordial and deferential servant,
LORD IXABERT
​

Feel free to use this thread to discuss people who are getting cancelled or to discuss the process of cancel culture.

Many (but not all) "extremists" know they are triggering people. If triggering people shows a giant network of resources and middlemen designed to shut down speech, then the triggering was successful. Such networks could then be turned and used against people simply for expressing classic left or right wing views. It may start out over topics that polite society has consensus on such as holocaust revisionism, but the resources are then available to shut down Alex Jones next, then Donald Trump ... the line can keep moving until the point where the line is simply hurting another person's feelings. As soon as the tools and mechanisms are available in the private sector to shut speech down, those tools can be used on people who comform to the rules but carefully conform with insufficient enthusiasm. I think the greatest thing political dissidents do is get the centralized private sector bureaucracy to expose its own existence. It's not about who is being shut down, it's about the fact that they have the ability and coordination to shut people down.

edit: At one point the movement against the Iraq war was subject to cancel culture.​

 

[Gawn Chippin]

Reverse role play in action:

 

[Lord Osmund de Ixabert]

It's all an elaborate ruse to put white people in the defensive and increase white racial consciousness. Then they will use whites for war.

 

[Gawn Chippin]

Ballet is elitist and too White:

'Dance is not a museum': how ballet is reimagining problematic classics

Historical ballets are rife with offensive colonial politics but choreographers and dancers are finding creative ways to change them for today’s audiences

www.theguardian.com

...If many of the 19th-century ballet classics have the same entitled and Eurocentric viewpoint, then this is something that surely has to be tempered...

...Shakespeare presents us with similar challenges in Othello, or the compliant woman in The Taming of the Shrew or the conversion of Jewish Jessica at the end of The Merchant of Venice...

 

[Lord Osmund de Ixabert]

This is an example of how the left and right always act in unison, not only in the political realm, but also in the realm of cultural subversion.

In the culture struggle left and right are on the same side.

Thus when it comes to ballet, the left-wing cultural philistine seeks to subvert and deform it for political motives, revealing that he has no true appreciation of the art. The effect of his influence is destructive to ballet. Leftism is anti-ballet.

But on the other hand, the right-wing cultural philistine, instead of endeavouring to conserve his own culturural heritage, generally decries this art as a species of degeneracy in itself, associating it with effeminacy and faggotry. He too is anti-ballet.

Both are equally misguided. Both left and right in this case, as are but unnwitting pawns of the same forces. The real objectiv,e which both sides are pursing by different means, is the deconstruction of European culture, at all levels, a task of no small import.

Ballet is found to be particularly vexing due to the inherent aryocentricality of its nature.

Lord Osmund de [Ixabert]​

 

[Lord Osmund de Ixabert]

But on the other hand, the right-wing cultural philistine, instead of endeavouring to conserve his own culturural heritage, generally decries this art as a species of degeneracy in itself, associating it with effeminacy and faggotry. He too is anti-ballet.​

To elaborate. The right-wing cultural philistine is limited by his inherent intellectual shortcomings. He lacks the sophistication of mind to appreciate the finer nuances and subtleties of art, and as a result, he is frequently impercepient to things of a more delicate and refined nature. Balle aspires to evoke a sense of the etherical, a realm of subtlety where grace and refinement reign supreme, and in ballet the beings of that realm assume a human form. The cultural philistine is peculiarly blind to all of this, unable to distinguish between effeminacy and things of grace, beauty, subtelty, and refinement.

Ixabert​

 

[Gawn Chippin]

...decries this art as a species of degeneracy in itself, associating it with effeminacy and faggotry...​

Ballet has been Woak, beginning with the introduction of Beta male performers to this art form

 

[Lord Osmund de Ixabert]

Ballet has been Woak, beginning with the introduction of Beta male performers to this art form

​

The imagery seems a bit redundant. I think we all already know what boys look like, and also what ballet practice looks like. I must say, the information being presented is not particularly enlightening or instructive. It leaves much to be desired in terms of imparting knowledge.

What connexion any of this has with the concept ‘beta male’, the reasons for its negative evaluation, the cause for its maligned status, and the intention behind the dissemination of such imagery—these are things which remain elusive to my understanding.

All that you have revealed to me is that you yourself are a cultural philistine, and are working in tandem with the left to subvert Aryan culture. You’re just doing it by different means. They seek to sully the magnificence of our esteemed Aryan culture, and endeavour to persuade us to renounce our own patrimony—just as in the political arena, they conspire to hoodwink us into overthrowing our own hallowed institutions.

Thank you very much for proving my point. Right-wingers do act in perfect unison with the left. This is the rôle that right-wingers play under the present globalist New World Order régime.

It is also evident that you have not the faintest inkling as to what a 'beta male’ is. I trust that you shall find my forthcoming essay on the subject of beta males to be a most illuminating endeavour. It shall dispel the many misconceptions that seem to abound regarding this particular subject. I now bid you adieu, and with my warmest regards, I remain &c.,

Ixabert​

 

[Gawn Chippin]

"Cance Culture" should be honestly defined as Culture Cancellers.
The following was taken at a funeral cerimony:

https://webcache2.fss.tiscali.com/flashpdit/cmsv/video_tv/032023/51c927a7169ff96abe8c49a50b18a665.mp4

 

[Gawn Chippin]

Invasive hornet species to become Nordicised, without Thor's approval:

Why murder hornets are getting a new name

The world’s largest wasp has a new common name, designed to avoid evoking fear and xenophobia: the northern giant hornet.

www.nationalgeographic.com

...For this reason, Looney coined “northern giant hornet”...

 

[Gawn Chippin]

 

[Lord Osmund de Ixabert]

By eschewing the designations ‘man’ or ‘woman’, one willingly parts with the rights that the law typically grants to those individuals who bear such designations. Yet in a realm as nonsensical as the one we live in, it makes a peculiar sort of sense. If, therefore, these individuals wish to surrender the rights otherwise bestowed upon them, by not identifying as either men or women, well, that is just another peculiarity to be accepted in this topsy-turvy world. ​

 

[Gawn Chippin]

 

[Gawn Chippin]

 

[Lord Osmund de Ixabert]

Oh yeah? Is that all you have to say?

 

[Gawn Chippin]

What's more to say? Aren't the above-posted images self explanatory yet?

 

[Gawn Chippin]

Early Cancelculture conversation pieces

 

[Gawn Chippin]

An old lady dance group will be forbidden from further appearing in ethnic costume: