Donald Trump Is Talking About White People Now

[Petr]

Donald Trump Is Talking About White People Now

Donald Trump is trying to catch up with his base

occidentaldissent.com

Donald Trump Is Talking About White People Now​

January 16, 2022 Hunter Wallace

Here is my grand theory of Donald Trump:

Donald Trump is a Boomer.

Donald Trump watches FOX News and was never on the internet. He doesn’t read.

Donald Trump usually says what he thinks is popular like with the vax.

Donald Trump says what he thinks can get him elected based on polls.

Donald Trump is suddenly talking about White people and anti-White discrimination, which he didn’t do throughout his entire presidency, because Tucker Carlson broke the ice in 2021.

So, the real question for us is how do we influence people who write Tucker Carlson’s content because that is evidently the leading indicator of our politics.

Note: It was taboo to even talk about White people until Dump lost the 2020 election. I still say that defeat was a much needed kick in the ass.

 

[Petr]

David "Spengler" Goldman is a neocon Jew, but he has somewhat more intelligence and tact than someone like Bill Kristol, and thus he likes to "hedge his bets" with the Trump supporters, not wanting to alienate them too much. He seeks to make the demands of right-wing nationalists compatible with Judaic interests. Goldman is thus like a representative of the "Kushnerite" wing of Jewry, that would like to exploit Trump and his movement rather than outright opposing them.

Here we have his take on that episode last month when Trump declared that "American Jews do not love Israel." We can see that Goldman was clearly startled by this goyish outburst, feeling that many other American goys might follow Trump's example, but tries to soothe this eruption:

Donald Trump's Alleged Anti-Semitism

pjmedia.com

Donald Trump's Alleged Anti-Semitism​

BY DAVID P. GOLDMAN DEC 18, 2021 6:57 PM ET

Liberal Jewish outlets and the liberal media are charging Donald Trump with anti-Semitism, on the basis of his recent remarks to Israeli journalist Barak Raviv:

There’s people in this country that are Jewish [who] no longer love Israel. I’ll tell you the evangelical Christians love Israel more than the Jews of this country. It used to be that Israel had absolute power over Congress, and today I think it’s the exact opposite. And I think [former President Barack] Obama and [President Joe] Biden did that.

“And yet in the election, they still get a lot of votes from Jewish people, which tells you that the Jewish people—and I’ve said this for a long time—the Jewish people in the United States either don’t like Israel or don’t care about Israel. I mean, you look at The New York Times, The New York Times hates Israel. Hates them. And they’re Jewish people who run The New York Times, I mean the Sulzberger family.

The line about “absolute power over Congress” is cringeworthy. Yes, it is an anti-Semitic trope. Trump fits the canonical definition of a philo-Semite (an anti-Semite who likes Jews). He harbors some anti-Semitic prejudices about the extent of Jewish power. But he’s still a friend of the Jewish people and of the State of Israel. Before the 2016 election, an Israeli politician asked me what I thought of Trump (full disclosure: I worked for Ted Cruz in 2016). I said, “Imagine if Hitler had liked Jews!” I published that malicious remark. Nonetheless, I voted for Trump twice and defended him against the Deep State conspiracy to unseat him. There are anti-Semites and anti-Semites, but I’ll get to that.

As my friend Caroline Glick writes in Israel Hayom:

Trump was the most pro-Israel president in history. None of his predecessors, (and certainly not his successor President Joe Biden), come close….[he]stopped US financial support for the Palestinian Authority and shut down the PLO’s representative office in Washington, DC because Abbas funds and incites terrorism.

And of course, Trump moved the US Embassy to Jerusalem, and recognized the legality of Israel’s communities in Judea and Samaria…[and] stopped US funding for UNRWA because the UN agency funds terrorism. He pulled the US out of the UN Human Rights Committee because of its institutional antisemitism. He pulled the US out of the nuclear deal with Iran. He recognized Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights.

Let’s take Trump’s statement apart.

The authoritative Pew Survey published a poll of Jewish Americans’ attitudes towards Israel earlier this year. Only 34% of American Jewish adults say they strongly oppose boycott, divestment and sanctions against the State of Israel and only 33% say the Israel government sincerely wants peace. To be sure, 60% say they have “a lot” or “some” in common with Israel. Translation: Liberal American Jews will entertain a degree of positive sentiment for Israel as long as Israel agrees to commit suicide to conform to their fantasy of what a Jewish State should be. Never mind that successive Israeli governments have offered the Arabs 90% of what they asked for, and had the door slammed in their faces.

The supposedly “moderate” Fatah faction of the Palestinians is kept alive by Israeli bayonets; left to its own devices, it would fall in a heartbeat to Hamas, as it did in Gaza in 2007. Hamas has perpetrated more than 80 terror attacks in Israel and murdered about 1,000 Israelis. The Hamas charter rejects any negotiated solution and demands instead jihad to destroy the State of Israel.

This requires Israel to maintain control over parts of Judea and Samaria (the so-called West Bank) that lie within rocket range of Tel Aviv, Ben Gurion airport, and critical infrastructure. To return to the 1948 armistice lines would be an act of suicide. 90% of Arabs live under the political control of the Palestinian Authority, but Israel has no choice but to rule directly some small portion of the Arab population, and that sometimes is unpleasant. Which offends the universalist sensibilities of liberal American Jews.

A majority of American Jews, therefore, says to Israel in so many words, “We have some sentimental attachment to you, but we think you’re wicked warmongers and won’t do anything to stop attempts to strangle you economically.”

Sadly, Trump is right about American Jews. Without evangelical and other Christians (including many conservative Catholics), Israel’s cause would be lost in the United States.

As for Trump’s anti-Semitic attitudes: There’s anti-Semitism, and then there’s anti-Semitism. There is plenty of anti-Jewish prejudice out there, including a lot of exaggerated views of Jewish power. There are plenty of non-Jews who simply don’t like us. I really don’t care much whether they do or not. But then there is a universalist obsession which abhors the Jews precisely because we have survived for nearly 4,000 years while all the peoples we have known disappeared. We are a reminder of the mortality not just of man but of nations, that the norm is not universal enlightenment but national extinction. Parts of the Muslim world are hell-bent on collective suicide, and we won’t keep them company in that enterprise — as the liberals demand.

That is the horrible secret of what might be called existential anti-Semitism — an objection to the existence of the Jews. Horribly, it infects many American liberal Jews, who are doing everything they can to stop being Jews as quickly as practicable. I’ll take Donald Trump over anti-Israel liberal Jews any time.

 

[UltraRightWing]

Donald Trump Is Talking About White People Now

Donald Trump is trying to catch up with his base

occidentaldissent.com

Donald Trump Is Talking About White People Now​

January 16, 2022 Hunter Wallace

Here is my grand theory of Donald Trump:

Donald Trump is a Boomer.

Donald Trump watches FOX News and was never on the internet. He doesn’t read.

Donald Trump usually says what he thinks is popular like with the vax.

Donald Trump says what he thinks can get him elected based on polls.

Donald Trump is suddenly talking about White people and anti-White discrimination, which he didn’t do throughout his entire presidency, because Tucker Carlson broke the ice in 2021.

So, the real question for us is how do we influence people who write Tucker Carlson’s content because that is evidently the leading indicator of our politics.

Note: It was taboo to even talk about White people until Dump lost the 2020 election. I still say that defeat was a much needed kick in the ass.

I agree. He only knows what he is told or what he sees on MSM. We need a much younger, more sophisticated leader. There is no stopping Trump from being the nominee this time around. The time to start grooming the 2028 nominee is upon us. The 2028 nominee will have an even greater impact on our future.

 

[Rawhide "Doug" Kobayashi]

Too Little, Too Late.

 

[Petr]

Axios: The Making of a Modern Republican

The Republican Party is up for grabs and our side is winning

occidentaldissent.com

Axios: The Making of a Modern Republican​

February 4, 2022

Hunter Wallace

In retrospect, I got too blackpilled during the Trump era.

After everything that happened when Trump was president, I find it stunning to say that now. For a variety of reasons, I have flipped though over the past two years from pessimism to optimism.

Axios:

“Who had the power:​

• The U.S. Chamber of Commerce
• The NRA
• The Koch network
• Heritage Action
• The Drudge Report
• National Review
• Conservative movement groups such as Tea Party Express, FreedomWorks, and the Senate Conservatives Fund.

Who has power now:​

• Donald Trump
• Tucker Carlson
• Family and former aides to Trump
• Fox News
• Club for Growth
• Daily Wire
• Breitbart News
• Online influencers including Candace Owens, Ben Shapiro, Dan Bongino, Joe Rogan, Jack Posobiec, Charlie Kirk and Marjorie Taylor-Greene.
• Steve Bannon
• Susan B. Anthony List

Between the lines: Most of these changes weren’t gradual. They were triggered by the shockwave of 2016. …”​

Here’s why:

At the time, I was overly focused on Trump, Congress and their failure to push through a nationalist policy agenda. The Trump administration was a huge disappointment after the excitement of the 2016 campaign. Everything that I said about Dump’s personality cult turned out to be true.

In the background of all this, however, the old GOP was in the process of falling apart. Powerbrokers inside the rotten party were losing power. Polarization was increasing. “Journalists” were becoming tagged as “the enemy of the people.” Most importantly, the conservative media landscape was changing and the voters were changing. The base itself was changing a lot faster than the institutional party.

So, we ended up in a situation where we had a Boomer narcissist as president who was surrounded by incompetent cronies that owed their success to flattering his ego. We had a gerontocracy in Congress that was the product of the old conservative movement. We had an administration that was staffed with treacherous Con Inc. types. Trump worked with those people to secure “wins.”

Meanwhile, our real strength was specifically with younger conservatives under the age of 40. There is a massive gap on racial equality. 40% of older conservatives believe that racial equality is a very important issue compared to only 3.8% of younger conservatives. The split within the party is mainly an age divide. We’re not influencing Reaganites who settled on their ideology when we were in kindergarten.

As time has moved on, things haven’t “returned to normal.” Instead, the base of the party has become much more in flux and much more radical than when Dump was president. He spent his entire presidency ignoring White people. It wasn’t until last month that he brought up White people because of the story about COVID therapeutics that he had saw on FOX News.

Anyway, even if he wins the presidency in 2024, Trump himself will be gone in a few years. The old conservative movement will be long gone. The people who supported it will be gone too. American politics is going to become much more radical as younger people replace them.

 

[UltraRightWing]

Axios: The Making of a Modern Republican

The Republican Party is up for grabs and our side is winning

occidentaldissent.com

Axios: The Making of a Modern Republican​

February 4, 2022

Hunter Wallace

In retrospect, I got too blackpilled during the Trump era.

After everything that happened when Trump was president, I find it stunning to say that now. For a variety of reasons, I have flipped though over the past two years from pessimism to optimism.

Axios:

“Who had the power:​

• The U.S. Chamber of Commerce
• The NRA
• The Koch network
• Heritage Action
• The Drudge Report
• National Review
• Conservative movement groups such as Tea Party Express, FreedomWorks, and the Senate Conservatives Fund.

Who has power now:​

• Donald Trump
• Tucker Carlson
• Family and former aides to Trump
• Fox News
• Club for Growth
• Daily Wire
• Breitbart News
• Online influencers including Candace Owens, Ben Shapiro, Dan Bongino, Joe Rogan, Jack Posobiec, Charlie Kirk and Marjorie Taylor-Greene.
• Steve Bannon
• Susan B. Anthony List

Between the lines: Most of these changes weren’t gradual. They were triggered by the shockwave of 2016. …”​

Here’s why:

At the time, I was overly focused on Trump, Congress and their failure to push through a nationalist policy agenda. The Trump administration was a huge disappointment after the excitement of the 2016 campaign. Everything that I said about Dump’s personality cult turned out to be true.

In the background of all this, however, the old GOP was in the process of falling apart. Powerbrokers inside the rotten party were losing power. Polarization was increasing. “Journalists” were becoming tagged as “the enemy of the people.” Most importantly, the conservative media landscape was changing and the voters were changing. The base itself was changing a lot faster than the institutional party.

So, we ended up in a situation where we had a Boomer narcissist as president who was surrounded by incompetent cronies that owed their success to flattering his ego. We had a gerontocracy in Congress that was the product of the old conservative movement. We had an administration that was staffed with treacherous Con Inc. types. Trump worked with those people to secure “wins.”

Meanwhile, our real strength was specifically with younger conservatives under the age of 40. There is a massive gap on racial equality. 40% of older conservatives believe that racial equality is a very important issue compared to only 3.8% of younger conservatives. The split within the party is mainly an age divide. We’re not influencing Reaganites who settled on their ideology when we were in kindergarten.

As time has moved on, things haven’t “returned to normal.” Instead, the base of the party has become much more in flux and much more radical than when Dump was president. He spent his entire presidency ignoring White people. It wasn’t until last month that he brought up White people because of the story about COVID therapeutics that he had saw on FOX News.

Anyway, even if he wins the presidency in 2024, Trump himself will be gone in a few years. The old conservative movement will be long gone. The people who supported it will be gone too. American politics is going to become much more radical as younger people replace them.

In particular it will be the party of those who had the American dream stolen right out from under them whilst "Conservatives" stood by and did nothing. There isn't anything else to preserve, but there is much to create!

 

[Petr]

 

[Petr]

Why Trump Failed - Vox Popoli

Donald Trump’s failure to cross the Rubicon is explained by his reaction to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Former President Donald Trump admitted he believed Russian President Vladimir Putin was only trying to ‘negotiate’ when he sent troops to the Ukraine border and was ‘surprised’ when the...

voxday.net

Why Trump Failed​

Posted on March 16, 2022 by VD

Donald Trump’s failure to cross the Rubicon is explained by his reaction to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Former President Donald Trump admitted he believed Russian President Vladimir Putin was only trying to ‘negotiate’ when he sent troops to the Ukraine border and was ‘surprised’ when the Kremlin leader actually invaded the country.
‘I’m surprised — I’m surprised. I thought he was negotiating when he sent his troops to the border. I thought he was negotiating,’ Trump told the Washington Examiner during a Tuesday evening phone interview from his Mar-a-Lago estate. ‘I thought it was a tough way to negotiate but a smart way to negotiate.’
Trump, who seemingly developed a close working relationship with Moscow during his presidency, said Putin has ‘very much changed’ since the pair last worked together.
‘I figured he was going to make a good deal like everybody else does with the United States and the other people they tend to deal with — you know, like every trade deal. We’ve never made a good trade deal until I came along,’ Trump said. ‘And then he went in — and I think he’s changed. I think he’s changed. It’s a very sad thing for the world. He’s very much changed.’

I’ve mentioned this observation before, but Trump’s character has never been demonstrated more clearly than by this comment about Vladimir Putin. Trump’s strength is that he is a legitimately great negotiator. However, as with all successful men, his weaknesses are related to his strengths. Trump is a talker, not a doer. He is a negotiator, not a warrior. He conflates speech with action. He’s not a fighter, and never having been punched in the face or thrown down another man in the judo ring, he doesn’t understand men who are.

Of course he thought Putin was negotiating by mobilizing the Russian Army, threatening an invasion, and issuing an ultimatum, because he thinks everything is a negotiation. Hence his failure to take action after the fraudulent election of 2020; there probably wasn’t any chance of him actually doing so even if the US military could have been relied upon to obey its Commander-in-Chief – something we can’t know either way despite what various people claim – because for him even an approach to the Rubicon would have been a negotiating point rather than the beginning of a military action.

Remember, the Senate was massively surprised when Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon and marched on Rome, because despite his military successes on the Mediterranean and in Gaul, they knew him to be a skilled politician and negotiator. And negotiators always prefer jaw-jaw to war-war.

So Trump is a negotiator and Putin is a fighter. What, one wonders, is Xi Xinping?

 

[Petr]

 

[Petr]

Trump is still being useful in taking down the neocons:

 

[Lord Osmund de Ixabert]

It is called being a whigger.

 

[Petr]

Donald Trump, Dynasty Killer: 2023 Will Mean No More Bush, Cheney, McCain, or Clinton in Office

The era of Donald Trump has brought a great many changes to the political world since 2016, and the year 2023 will be no different.

www.breitbart.com

 

[Petr]

 

[kanethenotorious]

I no longer think of Trump as a third party politician, he's now a pretty assimilated Republican so I judge him as a Republican. That means the entire Republican Party would have to be "anti anti-White" for Trump to do anything "anti anti-White." Maybe that's happening now, with Tucker Carlson being a good example.
That's probably not enough to drag me away from a third party perspective and make me a maga hat. The critique against the two party system is too strong on too many issues,

 

[Petr]

Trump Puts American Jews On Notice

Donald Trump thinks he catered too much to the Jews

occidentaldissent.com

Trump Puts American Jews On Notice​

October 16, 2022

Hunter Wallace

Very disrespectful!

Apparently, Our King has been having second thoughts on Jexodus now that Sheldon Adelson is dead. Four years of MIGA kept Bibi Netanyahu, Jared Kushner and Sheldon Adelson happy while eroding support in his base.

Note: The Evangelicals are wonderful.

​

 

[Petr]

 

[Petr]