We also still demand drollery and delight, which means an interview with world-famous Wodwo.
Nevertheless you are a drug addict, Daryl.Breck claims I'm an "involuntary celibate." I claim Breck is an "involuntary comedian."
Meaning Breck is dead serious about his allegations, but they're so inaccurate that the fans he has take him for humor.
I don't recall what he smokes but he may suffering from cognitive issues.Breck claims I'm an "involuntary celibate." I claim Breck is an "involuntary comedian."
Meaning Breck is dead serious about his allegations, but they're so inaccurate that the fans he has take him for humor.
Nah he's not worthy. He's just not glamorous. He's more like the obese frybread cook with diabetes kind of guy. Maybe works at the casino. Pretty sure I saw him last year on that Four Corners trip.He was a Tonto figure to all of us Lone Rangers back in the day.
I don't recall what he smokes but he may suffering from cognitive issues.
I think most of the opposition here to clefty is his objections to organized religion, when it comes rite down to it.I must say, after taking in Breck's videos and giving them some thought, I find his analysis quite accurate in many ways and it it explains a lot of the dynamics here. Now I understand why someone like Clefty is not only encouraged but protected. My biggest mistake has always been being too honest and forthright in my interactions here and not understanding the games being played behind the scenes. I now see this site in a more accurate light. I'm a pretty good judge of character and when I talked with him on the phone, I got the sense Breck was being sincere and giving his honest assessment of things. Hopefully, we can work out a time in the near future for me to appear on his show (with a shirt however). I have some insights of my own I will share.
Your assessment is far off, at least in my case. I have no problem with criticizing organized religion or nationalism whatsoever. I don't even consider myself a nationalist at this point. I think you know people's problems with him go far deeper than that and I'm not sure why you said that. He delights in disrupting any kind of deep or meaningful conversation by taking them into the tard zone and then bemoaning how persecuted he is. It's a pattern. I now understand why he is protected and allowed to run wild. It's pretty clear what his religion is and it's not Christianity by most anyone's standards. I'm not sure what you mean by the 'active imagination' comment but I will assume it is an insult of some kind towards me.I think most of the opposition here to clefty is his objections to organized religion, when it comes rite down to it.
Attacking organized religion is also seen as an attack on tradition, as well as the underpinnings of most nationalism too.
That doesnt play well here bcuz the membership is hard-right on these issues.
Not everyone sees this as so objectionable to warrant a ban, even among the hardest of the hard-right here.
I am AOK with putting light on the many inherent faults of nationalism and organized religion. Remember that ego isnt all its cracked-up to be. I dont think God Almighty is all that pleased with men butchering other men over MUH this and MUH that.
Dunno what kinda games u think are afoot, but u have an activ imagination to be sure. Muh curiousity is piqued now. Lemme gno wat u think.
Kane, you are taking Breck's razzings too seriously.When I try to describe Breck, my vocabulary gets a bit exhausted. I'm trying to find a word for someone who thinks he's superior to others but is actually quite ignorant and shallow. I get why people find him funny though. I probably would if I wasn't being targeted by him and haven't observed his behavior for such a long time. But I think he is actually sincere in what he says, but he's like a person with bad vision who thinks he sees 20/20.
I wouldnt put u in the 'hard right' classificationYour assessment is far off, at least in my case. I have no problem with criticizing organized religion or nationalism whatsoever. I don't even consider myself a nationalist at this point. I think you know people's problems with him go far deeper than that and I'm not sure why you said that. He delights in disrupting any kind of deep or meaningful conversation by taking them into the tard zone and then bemoaning how persecuted he is. It's a pattern. I now understand why he is protected and allowed to run wild. It's pretty clear what his religion is and it's not Christianity by most anyone's standards. I'm not sure what you mean by the 'active imagination' comment but I will assume it is an insult of some kind towards me.
Both DAJ and Petr are top poasters. You shouldn't run off the good in defense of the lame. Now obviously not much will pry Petr out of here but DAJ is on the verge of going where Hartmann (another top poaster) went. If we are losing good poasters because of clefty you can say "put him on nignore" but please don't encourage those good poasters to leave. Is this place really going to choose to crash and burn over DA JOOS guy?
Go ahead and ban me if you so desire.I remember back on the Phora of yesteryear, if some goofballs would start whining about wanting someone banned, men of real character would suggest, to much agreement, the table be turned and those calling for bannings be banned.
How things change...