Hoes mad

Grug Arius

Phorus Primus
Staff member
In case you've been under a rock since yesterday

Roe v. Wade is no longer lawl,

Hoes no longer have Fedrule CONstipational protection to sacrifice their unborn children to Moloch by hiring quacks to rotavate them inside the womb. Its now up to the states whether or not they may do this.

 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    475.7 KB · Views: 3

clefty

Phoron
"Church Father John Chrysostom even turned these stereotypes on their head. Though criticizing abortions, in one sermon he offers the example of a sex worker forced to have an abortion so as to not lose her livelihood. While damning the act as a murderous practice, he places blame not on the woman, but on her client, chastising the man by saying that the sex worker cannot be criticized for seeking out an abortion, writing, that while “the shameless act is hers, the cause of it is yours.” Thus, it is the sex worker’s client who is the cause of the murder, not she who requires her attractive body to survive." https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/abortion-and-contraception-in-the-middle-ages/

good chance she became mad BEFORE she became a hoe...

long history of horrible attempts to correct the prior evil...
 

clefty

Phoron
clefty is the Phora's black pill. I call woodshed.
Blackpill?...Following Him His ways is exactly NOT blackpilled...

However all this LOL "Hoes Mad" energy reminds me of joos...

joos who also exactly wished to blame AND PUNISH...ONLY THE WOMAN...

I'm sure you'll recall in John 8 when da joos dragged out the woman caught in adultery "in the very act"...but of course where's da man?

Did He condemn her? ADD to her burden? Jeer "you mad hoe?"....did He sit and drink a beer to watch the roastie rage?

He could easily have joined the joos their pious righteous indignation to condemn her but instead He understood that His Law had a Spirit...of fairness...and to restore...make right...not make further burdens and add more hardship...

And them joos (as some now do) needed reminding "then you shall bring BOTH of them out to the gate of that town" Deut 22...so He gently reminded them their attitude really sucked when it came to the good life following Him His ways...and told her "go and sin NO MORE"

Hey how about we add to "pro life" ..."pro life with dad"...and by LAW the father of the unwanted baby is then too pay and care and help raise the child he made AND SHE KEPT...

"so you had your fun kid...now take account for your actions...what? Now you mad bro?"
 
Last edited:

Grug Arius

Phorus Primus
Staff member
Oh for fuck's sake clefty

Hoes are mad they cannot kill babies anymore and you gotta be a WET BLANKET

Are men also to blame for unwanted pregnancies and illegitimate children? Damn straight, who is even gonna argue that hoemongers dont share half the responsibility?

But non-hoemongering men who did everything right had NO power to stop women from killing their babies.

The power rested ENTIRELY with the hoes.

This is now changing. HOES are losing a special power.

Thus, HOES MAD

 

Nikephoros II Phokas

Administrator
Staff member
"Church Father John Chrysostom even turned these stereotypes on their head. Though criticizing abortions, in one sermon he offers the example of a sex worker forced to have an abortion so as to not lose her livelihood. While damning the act as a murderous practice, he places blame not on the woman, but on her client, chastising the man by saying that the sex worker cannot be criticized for seeking out an abortion, writing, that while “the shameless act is hers, the cause of it is yours.” Thus, it is the sex worker’s client who is the cause of the murder, not she who requires her attractive body to survive." https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/abortion-and-contraception-in-the-middle-ages/

good chance she became mad BEFORE she became a hoe...

long history of horrible attempts to correct the prior evil...

Garbage. St. John Chrysostom did no such thing. He placed the blame of the crime on the whore and he always spoke in general terms. He condemned abortion as worse than murder. His idea, which is sound, is that men shouldn't consort with whores lest they share some moral culpability in their crimes that arise out of whoremongering beyond the act of fornication itself like abortion and sorcery. Here is the quote itself.


„Why do you sow where the field is eager to destroy the fruit? Where there are medicines of sterility? Where there is murder before birth? You do not even let a harlot remain a harlot, but you make her a murderess as well. Do you see that from drunkenness comes fornication, from fornication adultery, from adultery murder? Indeed, it is something worse than murder and I do not know what to call it; for she does not kill what is formed but prevents its formation. What then? Do you contemn the gift of God, and fight with His laws? What is a curse, do you seek as though it were a blessing? Do you make the anteroom of birth the anteroom of slaughter? Do you teach the woman who is given to you for the procreation of offspring to perpetrate killing? That she may always be beautiful and lovable to her lovers, and that she may rake in more money, she does not refuse to do this, heaping fire on your head; and even if the crime is hers, you are the cause. Hence also arise idolatries. To look pretty many of these women use incantations, libations, philtres, potions, and innumerable other things. Yet after such turpitude, after murder, after idolatry, the matter still seems indifferent to many men–even to many men having wives. In this indifference of the married men there is greater evil filth; for then poisons are prepared, not against the womb of a prostitute, but against your injured wife. Against her are these innumerable tricks, invocations of demons, incantations of the dead, daily wars, ceaseless battles, and unremitting contentions.“
 

Macrobius

Megaphoron
Too be sure, the law is more about State's Rights than it is about Abortion per se (which is the whole point of the ruling).

Still a good thing, but it leaves me a bit dubious about what the outcome will be, pending an overthrow of YOG. The PTB mostly just want to set up a street fight with grrl power energy at the polls for mid-terms, followed by a royal smackdown for 'conservative' YOGsters.

*Lucy offers you a football, normie dudes* (Abort, Retry, Cancel?)

Still, victory is victory. HAIL VICTORY. *WUMP*

If the Yankee Occupation Government wanted to be consistent *and* moral, it would extend the 'equal protection' clause to cover the rights of a fetus from conception. If injuns are citizens (which they are since the early 20th century - at which time slavery was suppressed on reservations, as abortions should be [and Nike is right they will have trouble doing this]) ... that would apply to them redskins too.

I'm not wild about the idea of a treaty between sovereign states that 'enforces' the Bill of Rights on each of them -- that was a perverse reading of the original amendment to begin with, though a predictable one.

The Reconstruction amendments should be overturned, Washington DC burned to the ground and sowed with salt. Along with NYC and maybe London, as a warning to future generations.

What Washington and Lee started, will happen in this century, maybe by different hands.

Hail, Survivors of the Baby Human Holocaust.
 
Last edited:

Macrobius

Megaphoron
Interesting thread on the history of Laws prohibiting abortion in the West




Meanwhile, in Byzantium (this is about the prohibition of doctors performing them, not infanticide and related practices by parents).

 

clefty

Phoron

Consider: The state should require listing the genetic father on every birth certificate – not at the discretion of the mother -- so each parent, biological or relational, can be held equally responsible for the child.
 

Lord Osmund de Ixabert

I X A B E R T.com
Only idiots and weaklings kill their own offspring. Because stupid mothers be allowed to kill they own children, fewer idiots and weaklings be born than'd otherwise have been case. Only undesirable elements of population kill own offspring. I say let em destroy themselves. Nay, encourage em.​
 
Last edited:
Top