kanethenotorious
Phoron
The classic articles.
edit: The most recent version has some dead links. So for older content go here: https://web.archive.org/web/20081228084533/http://nationalfuturism.org/
Last edited:
National Fuhturism: Old Constantin Von Hoffmeister Website
- Thread starter kanethenotorious
- Start date
The classic articles.
edit: The most recent version has some dead links. So for older content go here: https://web.archive.org/web/20081228084533/http://nationalfuturism.org/
kanethenotorious
Phoron
Constantin Von Hoffmeister is correct, by the way, that Bolshevism was made not by religious Jews, but by apostates who left Judaism behind. He wrote that in his article "Jewish Bolshevism, European Liberation."
The interesting thing is that in the same article he supports Zionism, when it would seem the above statement is more of an assimilationist stance.
The interesting thing is that in the same article he supports Zionism, when it would seem the above statement is more of an assimilationist stance.
Arrow Cross
Member
I remember suffering an aneurysm from these articles back in 2006. And I've suffered one just now, too. What a gloriously confusing moment of nostalgia.
kanethenotorious
Phoron
He has a substack "eurosiberia" which he points to the domain https://www.eurosiberia.net/
By the way, I see the thread has been renamed fuhturism.
By the way, I see the thread has been renamed fuhturism.
ultright
Member
I think it is a mistake to view egalitarian movements as anything but peasant revolt. They are not materially different from one another: Jacobins, Bolsheviks, Pharisees, and Sophists seem to believe in the same subsidized individualism.
Petr
Administrator
Alas, oftentimes the most efficient and ruthless "egalitarianism" comes from the top, from absolutist royal rulers! I invite you to read this thread of mine:
Royal Absolutism as a Pathway to Egalitarian Democracy in Western History
This thread is meant to be a re-presentation of this Old Phora thread: http://www.thephora.net/forum/forum/the-academy/political-arena/47500-democratic-tyranny-is-not-an-oxymoron Simply put, royal absolutism mightily paved the way for egalitarian mass democracy in the Western civilization by...
thephora.net
Julius Caesar himself started his career as an "egalitarian" populist politician, beloved by the plebs and hated by the elitist Roman aristocracy.
Last edited:
Petr
Administrator
The common people rejoice at seeing despotic rulers "taking vengeance" on their behalf on proud noblemen:
en.wikisource.org
Ivan the Terrible/Part 3/Chapter 2 - Wikisource, the free online library
The Russian masses expressed their feelings in their popular poetry, and the sense of that is already known to my readers. The Russian people not only submitted to Ivan—it admired, applauded, loved him.
...
Herein lies the whole philosophy of the populace. It seems to have forgotten all about Ivan's wars, and all it remembers of the administrative reforms simultaneously effected is their levelling action.
'All the masters and princes,
I will flay them alive. …'
sings the Tsar Groznyï, Ivan Vassilovitch.
Or, again:
'I will have you cooked, every one,
Boïars and princes, in a caldron!'
The Groznyï is a pious man, and the poets admire this quality of his, but,
'As soon as he has heard Mass,
He'll cut their little heads
Off princes and boïars. …'
ultright
Member
Royal absolutism was a response to revolt by the nobles, if memory serves. Healthy monarchies rely on lesser aristocrats a great deal and on the Western side of the Hajnal line, manorial feudalism kept this alive.
Russia is a different case because you had a European upper caste ruling over Eurasian peasants who outnumbered them thousands to one. It is more similar to the situation in Mexico, India, or South America than what happened in Europe.