kanethenotorious
Class Reductionist
The classic articles.
edit: The most recent version has some dead links. So for older content go here: https://web.archive.org/web/20081228084533/http://nationalfuturism.org/
Last edited:
The Jews were certainly overrepresented in the Soviet government. But this fact is utterly irrelevant and meaningless. These brave Jews divorced themselves from their reactionary religion and embraced European socialism (Russian Bolshevism), thus automatically becoming honorary Aryans. Hence, the Bolshevik Jews were not bad Jews but good Europeans (in the Nietzschean sense as like all true overmen they overcame their own former selves, morphing into something new, noble and self-sacrificing)
I think it is a mistake to view egalitarian movements as anything but peasant revolt. They are not materially different from one another: Jacobins, Bolsheviks, Pharisees, and Sophists seem to believe in the same subsidized individualism.Constantin Von Hoffmeister is correct, by the way, that Bolshevism was made not by religious Jews, but by apostates who left Judaism behind.
I think it is a mistake to view egalitarian movements as anything but peasant revolt. They are not materially different from one another: Jacobins, Bolsheviks, Pharisees, and Sophists seem to believe in the same subsidized individualism.
Royal absolutism was a response to revolt by the nobles, if memory serves. Healthy monarchies rely on lesser aristocrats a great deal and on the Western side of the Hajnal line, manorial feudalism kept this alive.Alas, oftentimes the most efficient and ruthless "egalitarianism" comes from the top, from absolutist royal rulers!