News About Belarus

Petr

Administrator
I hope this new system heralds the dawn of new era when things are no longer so dependent on Lukashenko personally, but there is a strong pro-Russian political machine in place instead:


Belarus Gears Up for Elections and Powerful New People’s Assembly

14.11.2023​
Just the appearance of a body like the All-Belarusian People’s Assembly after the elections will legitimize conversations about succession within the ruling elite.


The Belarusian authorities are preparing for elections next year: the first since a disputed presidential vote triggered huge opposition demonstrations and a brutal crackdown three years ago. While there’s little chance of any surprises, the elections are significant because they will usher in major changes to the structure of the regime. In accordance with a new section of the constitution added last year, the All-Belarusian People’s Assembly will become an official organ with immense powers. It’s a step on the path to a Belarus without its contested leader Alexander Lukashenko, even if it’s impossible to say how long that path will be.​
Even in freer times, the local and parliamentary elections scheduled for February 25 wouldn’t have generated much interest in Belarus. After three years of unrelenting repression and mass emigration, they are more predictable than ever. There are not even any arguments among the opposition about whether to take part or not: it’s simply too dangerous.​
On top of controlling the streets, the media, and the vote count, the authorities have dissolved all true opposition parties, as well as several pro-regime parties. Of fifteen parties, just four remained: the relatively centrist ruling party Belaya Rus; two nominally left-wing parties, including the Communist Party; and a supposedly right-wing party.
The Belarusian opposition will ignore the elections, a tactic they are likely to replicate in the 2025 presidential vote (if nothing changes). The opposition in exile views the elections as illegitimate, because since 2020 they have deemed Lukashenko an usurper.​
There is no chance the elections will be honest. Elections in Belarus are increasingly nothing more than an administrative ritual for the regime rather than a stress test or a forum for competing ideas. All the candidates will support Lukashenko to varying degrees.​
Still, old habits die hard, and the Belarusian authorities have drawn up a pre-election program of sorts. After all, the upcoming elections are the opening event in an electoral cycle that will include the establishment of the All-Belarusian People’s Assembly and the 2025 presidential election.​
There are three ideological pillars for the campaign, of which “armed pacifism” is the main one. This means, on the one hand, constantly claiming that—thanks to Lukashenko—Belarus is at peace. On the other hand, the country is boosting its military capabilities.
Barely an official speech or a Belarusian TV talk show goes by without public thanks for the leader who has stopped the country from being dragged into a conflict. The war engulfing Russia and Ukraine has given the Belarusian regime a convenient way of lowering expectations. There may be a new Iron Curtain, and Western sanctions may be painful, the logic goes, but at least we are safe from bombs and our men are not sitting in dugouts.
At the same time, Belarusian officials believe they need to be prepared, and the country has been steadily militarizing for the last two years. Former security officials have top civilian posts—in areas from museums to special economic zones for high-tech companies—and the defense budget increased 40 percent in 2023 alone. The Defense Ministry has been given greater powers, and punishments have been tightened for “discrediting” the army and evading conscription for compulsory national service.​
Military training exercises are constantly under way, with fighters from the Russian mercenary company Wagner who remained in Belarus after their failed insurrection last year passing on their expertise. New units are also being formed, from special forces groups to a people’s militia.​
The second pillar of the campaign is an already familiar populist, left-wing narrative. This time, however, the government has decided to go all in. For a year now, Lukashenko has been slowing inflation by forbidding both state and private retailers to raise prices without permission. Offenders are demonstratively punished. The regime is now also poised to introduce several wealth taxes, despite the tiny amount of revenue they will raise.​
The third and final pillar consists of taking a page out of Russia’s playbook by highlighting “family values” and assailing LGBT rights. Laws are being drawn up that will ban “LGBT propaganda.” As the authorities seek to justify this by citing demographic concerns, they will also ban the dissemination of the idea of choosing not to have children. Lukashenko has already publicly warned of the risks of a childfree “ideology,” and those warnings are being widely parroted by officials and state-controlled media. Belarusian TV is waging a campaign to get women to have more children, and at a younger age.
Immediately after the elections, Belarus will activate a section of the constitution added in 2022 that mandates the creation of an All-Belarusian People’s Assembly (ABPA). In total, about 1,200 people will be appointed by regional and national authorities to this pro-regime organ, which is supposed to represent “civil society,” local bureaucracy, and central government bodies.​
In reality, it will be a cross between a Soviet plenum of the Communist Party’s Central Committee and China’s National People’s Congress. It will have authority over all branches of government, including the executive. It’s no secret that Lukashenko will be the chairman of the ABPA, as the constitution allows only the first president of Belarus (Lukashenko) to occupy both this post and the presidency until 2035.​
No one is hiding the point of the new body: to prepare the system for Lukashenko stepping down as president. The ABPA will be able to introduce martial law, initiate an impeachment, cancel the results of presidential elections, nullify all government decisions (apart from those made by the courts), and sign off on all major political appointments.​
The ABPA’s fifteen-person presidium will become a sort of equivalent of the Soviet Union’s Politburo. While Lukashenko is alive, its influence will be limited. But its makeup will be closely studied—like the Politburo’s—as a guide to whose political star is on the rise, and whose is waning.​
At the end of the day, it’s likely to be someone from Lukashenko’s inner circle who becomes the next leader of Belarus. Given the regional instability and the advanced age of both Lukashenko and his Russian sponsor, President Vladimir Putin, there are any number of possible triggers for change. Just the appearance of a body like the ABPA will legitimize conversations within the ruling elite about the succession. This means the word “afterward” will be on the lips of even those who prefer not to think about such things.​
 

Petr

Administrator
Meanwhile, the Western-toady opposition is showing displeasure at how inefficient the sanctions that are aimed at their own country currently are:


EU closing eyes to Belarus sanctions loopholes, opposition leader says
Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya says trade penalties on Minsk ‘have such huge loopholes that they don’t work effectively.’
BY EDDY WAX
NOVEMBER 16, 2023 2:27 PM CET
MÁLAGA, Spain — The EU is wilfully ignoring flaws in its sanctions regime against Belarus, said the country's opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya.
“The sanctions have such huge loopholes that they don’t work effectively,” Tsikhanouskaya told POLITICO in an interview at an international meeting of social democrat parties in Spain.
Brussels slapped waves of sanctions on Alexander Lukashenko's authoritarian regime in Belarus after the sham presidential election of 2020, the hijacking of a Ryanair plane and the instigation of a migration crisis on the EU's borders in 2021. Lukashenko has also supported Russia's war against Ukraine since 2022. EU sanctions on Belarus range from targeting the air travel, financial and arms sectors to hydrocarbons, timber and potash exports.
But those sanctions are often circumvented, Tsikhanouskaya said, including sanctioned Belarusian birchwood being exported to the EU by being labeled as coming from Kyrgyzstan. “It’s nonsense, but they close eyes," she said, referring to a workaround that investigative journalists have documented.
“Sometimes it looks like countries hold business-oriented policy but not values-oriented policy," she charged, calling for a better enforcement mechanism in the EU that can outfox wily dictators.
A new package of Belarus sanctions to target circumvention has been in the political freezer for months, because some EU countries, including Lithuania, oppose a possible exemption for Belarusian fertilizers. The Baltic country argues that allowing Belarusian fertilizers to flow through the EU would hand a lifeline to Lukashenko's regime but do little to alleviate food insecurity.
...
 

Petr

Administrator

Swapping repressive practices; What to expect from Vladimir Putin and Alexander Lukashenko’s ever closer union

8:02 pm, April 12, 2024
Source: Meduza

Two years into the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus appear to be intensifying their dialogue about the future of the Union State, the supranational body to which the two countries formally belong. On a visit to Russia this week, Alexander Lukashenko spent two days with Vladimir Putin, discussing issues related to the “regional and international situation” and “the coordination of actions in response to existing challenges and threats.” Earlier, the two sides announced that for the first time in 20 years, they were raising the Union State’s budget — by 38 percent. However, this money won’t be directed towards economic integration, but rather funneled into a “number of defense-related programs.” Journalist Roman Chernikov, who specializes in covering post-Soviet countries, explains how a shared affinity for political repression is bringing Moscow and Minsk closer together than the Union State ever did.

Russia and Belarus signed the treaty that created the supranational Union State back in December 1999. But the official holiday marking the Day of Unity of the Peoples of Russia and Belarus falls on April 2, the anniversary of an earlier Union Treaty between Moscow and Minsk. To mark the occasion this year, the Rossiya Segodnya Press Center in Moscow hosted a conference on the “Union State in a Multipolar World,” while Belarusian propagandists debated who should join the Union State next, bandying about such candidates as Abkhazia, Syria, Iran and, perhaps, a “de-Nazified Ukraine.”
Discussions about the integration project’s ideological underpinnings intensified, as well, with the Belarusians insisting that the Union State should be left-leaning, combining Soviet aesthetics with a dash of Putinist conservatism — namely, “spirituality,” “traditional family values,” and the memory of the USSR’s victory over fascism in World War II.
But if you look beyond the philosophizing about identity politics, it becomes clear that the Union State project hasn’t achieved much — aside from launching a joint crew into space and growing trade turnover (a logical result of Russia and Belarus’s isolation on the world stage). Even the promise to cancel roaming charges between Russia and Belarus by the end of 2024 seems like a joke: after more than a decade of talks, all they’ve managed is to systematically reduce the fees. Efforts to share information about traffic offenders and launch a joint car insurance system also have yet to be implemented fully.

Sovereignty first

Lately, Belarusian propagandists have taken to repeating the claim that the Union State doesn’t pose a threat to Belarus’s sovereignty. On the Day of Unity, for example, TV presenter Marat Markov assured that Belarus and Russia are not only “absolutely independent” within the Union State, but also “much more so than any country” in the European Union. “In the E.U., a supranational elite dictates rules to absolutely all members, to the detriment of their national interests. This is completely off the table in the Union State,” he claimed.
Back in January, Lukashenko pedaled this idea himself:
“I just read a think piece that [said,] ‘That’s it, Belarus is losing its sovereignty.’ We aren’t losing anything. You can see that on this sovereign territory, which belongs to our people, only we make decisions and we only act under conditions that are beneficial to us.”
Generally speaking, this is true — but only because integration remains nominal, even after the anti-government protests in Belarus in 2020 and Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The last time Moscow and Minsk touched on the topic of the Union State was in November 2021, when Putin and Lukashenko signed a package of 28 “union programs” aimed at economic integration. At the time, Lukashenko claimed that he and Putin had “thrown out” an additional program that had “political overtones.”

In essence, this program would have turned the Union State into something like an off-brand European Union, with supranational bodies (to handle taxation, for example), a single issuing bank, and, later, shared political bodies (along the lines of the European Council and the European Parliament). This was discussed in greater detail back in 2019, when the Union State was supposed to celebrate its 20th anniversary. Though Kremlin officials perhaps hoped to mark the occasion with a full economic takeover of Minsk, Lukashenko turned out to be more cunning and foiled their plans, in part by leaking the details of the negotiations in an interview with the radio station Ekho Moskvy.
Back then, informed sources told RBC that Russian officials expected to implement the most difficult integration programs by 2023–2024. But as of April 2024, we can safely say that there haven’t been any serious steps towards economic integration. What’s more, experts say that the steps that have been taken can be easily reversed in the event of changing political winds. If Western countries were to lift sanctions, for example, Belarusian exports would be redirected towards Baltic ports and European goods would flood back into Brest. The Russian and Belarusian Central Banks are even developing the digital ruble separately, even though this could be a convenient platform for combining efforts.
However, since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Moscow and Minsk have been integrating in other ways — namely, through coordinating repressions and propaganda.

Synchronized dictatorships

In February, news broke that Belarus and Russia are combining their extremism watchlists. According to Belarusian Ambassador to Russia Dmitry Krutoi, this was the result of multiple conversations between Interior Ministry officials from both countries.
Both Russia and Belarus have seen their watchlists balloon: Russia’s “terrorist and extremist” blacklist includes more than 14,300 individuals and organizations, while Belarus’s has nearly 4,000.
But while this measure is in the early stages, the synchronization of the two countries’ propaganda machines is practically a fait accompli. In late February, the Belarusian Embassy managed, for the first time, to pressure a Russian publication (Forbes Russia) into deleting an article that was critical of Lukashenko. Then, in April, the embassy decided to extend this practice to much bigger media players, including the business daily Kommersant and even Russian state television’s Channel One.
By all appearances, Minsk is chasing the prize of being considered Russia’s unique and unconditional ally (as distinct from other members of the Eurasian Union and the Collective Security Treaty Organization). But it also seems as though Moscow is interested in borrowing its neighbor’s political and repressive practices.
As Belarusian propagandist Vadim Gigin suggested, “one of the reasons for the union project stalling is the different development models” in Russia and Belarus. Whereas Russia formally maintained a multi-party system, Gigin argued, Belarus effectively developed a “non-party” system despite having no fewer than 15 political parties. According to Gigin, Belarusian political parties have “negligible” influence since their representatives hardly hold any positions in the government’s executive and legislative branches.
Gigin also said that since 2020, the most important change was to the All-Belarusian People’s Assembly (set to convene in late April), which is meant to serve as a source of legitimacy and act as a kind of crutch for the aging Lukashenko.
A possible equivalent for the Putin regime would be the All-Russia People's Front, if this political coalition were to become a separate government body. East Germany’s National Front is another possible precedent that could hold some appeal for Putin, who served as a KGB foreign intelligence officer in the GDR in the 1980s.
Lukashenko’s experience could be all the more relevant since the results of the 2024 Russian presidential vote showed that the previous party configuration has collapsed completely. If candidates from the nominal opposition, like the Communist Party (KPRF) and the Liberal Democratic Party (LDPR), only net three or four percent of the vote, this could be considered a non-party system. Moreover, talk of forming a “new, patriotic civil society” is fully in the spirit of the All-Belarusian People’s Assembly. Similarly, attempts to hand over control of youth policy to Putin’s domestic policy tsar Sergey Kiriyenko smacks of the Belarusian Republican Youth Union.
There is only one silver lining to this situation: thanks to the Union State, Russian citizens facing problems with the law have the Minsk airport as an additional escape route. Although document checks still take place on trains and regular buses, border guards do this selectively and often neglect to run passports through the database, as they’re mostly on the lookout for third-country nationals. Since the political upheavals in 2020, a number of gray carriers have popped up that take back roads, minimizing the likelihood of such inspections.
That said, Moscow and Minsk still share databases of citizens subject to entry and exit restrictions. But this system remains flawed and a time lag could be enough to save someone from prison or conscription.
 
Top