So about that New Covenant...

clefty

Phoron
"For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the LORD: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people." Jeremiah 31:33

Hebrews 9:16
In the case of a will, it is necessary to establish the death of the one who made it,

17because a will does not take effect until the one who made it has died; it cannot be executed while he is still alive.



A quick search confirms this STILL to be true in the legal world today:

"Because your Will takes effect only upon your death, you are free to sell your property whenever you like and without the consent or permission of the person who is supposed to receive that property under your Will. Selling property mentioned in your Will does not cancel your Will. It just means that your beneficiary does not receive that piece of property. Everything else in your Will remains valid.

Making changes to your Will: Codicils

If you want to make some minor changes to your Will, you can do so without writing an entirely new Will. You do, however, need to write a formal document. You should not simply scratch out certain parts of your Will and write in your changes. This is usually not legal.

A formal change to your Will is called a “codicil.” A codicil is a document that cancels certain parts of your Will, or adds new parts to your Will. It should refer to your Will, and say specifically what is being changed. It needs to be prepared in the same way that a Will is prepared. If your codicil is typed, it needs to be signed by you and two witnesses. The two witnesses must both be present when you sign. They do not have to be the same two people who witnessed your original Will. If you have handwritten the entire codicil, then you do not need to have witnesses. You just need to sign it yourself. All codicils should be dated.

Although there is no limit on the number of codicils that you can have, if you find that you have made a lot of changes, you should write a new Will. This will avoid confusion caused by having several different documents.

Cancelling your Will

You can also revoke your Will completely. Revoking a Will means to cancel it. If you want to cancel your Will and not replace it with anything right away, you can make a Codicil which says that you are cancelling your Will, or you can physically destroy your Will by tearing it up.

If you die without making a new Will, your property will be distributed as if you had died without a Will. If you want to cancel your Will and replace it with another Will, you can do this by writing a new Will because most Wills include a clause near the beginning that says that all earlier Wills are cancelled. https://www.legalline.ca/legal-answers/when-does-a-will-take-effect-and-can-it-be-changed/

When a loved one dies and leaves a last will and testament, there are important steps that must be taken for the will to be probated and its instructions followed out and assets distributed. The sooner the process is begun, the sooner the assets can be distributed to the beneficiaries named in the will.

If there are several wills, the latest one is the one that is valid and should be filed. If there is a codicil to a will (an amendment or addition) this must be filed with it.
Once the will has been filed, the court examines it to be sure it has been properly executed (signed and witnessed according to the laws of the state). In most states wills are self-proving, which means that if they appear to be executed validly, they are entered into probate without any trial, evidence or witnesses.

Heirs and beneficiaries are legally notified, which gives them the opportunity for contesting a will they believe is not valid. The more valuable the estate and the larger the assets, the longer it may take. An estate with many creditors and bills will also require a longer process. If anyone contests the will, the process will be delayed. Smaller estates with few assets and debts may move more quickly. In most cases, a will is probated and assets distributed within eight to twelve months from the time the will is filed with the court. https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/how-quickly-are-wills-probated-after-death

Time is of the essence. For those waiting to be benefited especially.

“Do not cling to Me,” Jesus said, “for I have not yet ascended to the Father. But go and tell My brothers, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, to My God and your God.’” John 20:17

Understandable He was in a hurry to file with the heavenly court His New Covenant which He signed by His blood and sealed with His death. What an amazing first fruit to testify and offer on that day of First Fruits.

So when was this NEW COVENANT written?

Acts 1:1In my first book, O Theophilus, I wrote about all that Jesus began to do and to teach, 2until the day He was taken up to heaven, after giving instructions through the Holy Spirit to the apostles He had chosen. 3After His suffering, He presented Himself to them with many convincing proofs that He was alive. He appeared to them over a span of forty days and spoke about the kingdom of God.

Obviously while He was yet alive. Through His teaching and living example. And even after His resurrection during those 40 days He remained with them Luke noted not ONE codicil He needed emphasizing.

The new covenant was signed and sealed.

Happily unlike with today's wills which often need further judgement by courts and lawyers we do indeed have a High Priest the Testator Himself with us to guide us through to the inheritance our faith receives.

Here's a hint:

"Here is the patience, steadfastness, constancy, endurance of the saints Here are they that keep the commandments of Yah and have the faith OF Christ" Rev 14:12

What faith OF Christ is that? What faith did He have? Hindu? Buddhism? Muslim? jooish? Christian?...East or West? But the faith of the New Covenant signed and sealed.
 
So the new covenant is when God strips Jews of being the chosen people and makes Christians the chosen people instead. That is what I was taught in Catholic School growing up. Your post talks about the circumstances around the new covenant, but doesn't really define it.
 

clefty

Phoron
So the new covenant is when God strips Jews of being the chosen people and makes Christians the chosen people instead. That is what I was taught in Catholic School growing up. Your post talks about the circumstances around the new covenant, but doesn't really define it.
Technically da joos stripped themselves of their “chosen” status by killing their Husband. The “I do” said by this ekklesia at Sinai is done. Their murder of Him parted the covenant which God put together.

The problem was not the marriage contract but the disobedient wife He “put away”. In her adultery (idolatry) she killed her Husband to go after others. Still does BTW…

Happily the Husband resurrected and now we’re into the New Covenant He wrote prior His getting killed. And He wishes to remarry an obedient submissive bride. Who loving Him as He loved her she WANTS to obey and please Him/His Way for what He’s done for her.

You were taught correctly about His believers being adopted into Israel by our faith and with the obedience to Him/His Way which it compels.

Branches baring fruits most similar to the trunk graft best.

By our faith we establish/uphold the Law Paul told the Romans and to receive our inheritance. “Good work faithful servant”. His obedient bride.

The definitions terms and conditions of this New Covenant are all taught AND DEMONSTRATED by Him…obviously prior His death.

As John confirmed “If you claim to be in Him you ought to live AS He did.” 1 John 2:6 …more like Him less like our former selves…or the world around us…and the traditions it comes up with…
 
Last edited:

clefty

Phoron
Galatians 3:14That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. 15Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.

Indeed once this last will, testament, covenant, contract is signed and sealed there can NOT be anything changed removed or added to this legal binding document.

Did Noah's covenant cancel out the Ademic/Edenic one? Since the earth was "washed" did Noah's covenant (which was a promise to never destroy the earth again with a flood) apply to the earth now no longer cursed? Would man no longer have to work by the sweat of his brow, women no longer in pain bare children? Was the enmity removed?

Of course not...the terms and conditions were still in place. Or could man now even worship other gods, kill, steal, commit adultery, lie etc...

Did Abraham's covenant cancel out either of the two prior? Make any changes at all? Was it possible to do so? Abraham who in his youth rejected the idols of his father was chosen. Of him He said "Because Abraham listened to My voice and kept My charge, My commandments, My statutes, and My laws" Gen 6:25

How about the Mosaic covenant? Did that cancel Abraham's promise? Or annull Noah's? COULD IT?

David got his own contract promising the messiah was to come from him...was that not confirming the line through the 4 prior covenants or where changes made prior?

To Jeremiah was the promise given of a New Covenant...COULD it change any of the prior ones? Sure if the changes were made PRIOR the death of the testator.

But all these were sealed by a death signed by blood shed and remains immutable and binding.

Is why Paul continues with the Galations 3:17"And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

18For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.

Well yes, that's exactly HOW grace works. Something given unearned but by His Grace.

As with any gift inheritance it is given not worked for.

And typically the testator chooses carefully the one to benefit from his inheritance. One who WANTS to continue in his ways...in remambrance of him.

Just as He chose to christen the New Covenant to His beloved and loving obedient followers.

Those in an upper room full of joos...not a gentile amongst them.
 
Last edited:

clefty

Phoron
Great. Another topic for everyone to nignore

lol...it's your last option...until you can win majority or authority to silence me...as is the tradition

you've resorted to mocking already...

but until you give evidence that He demonstrated or exemplified the teaching yours claims He taught PRIOR His sealing of the New Covenant at the cross you make of Him a typical hypocritical Pharisee who merely taught from Moses' seat but did NOT do what he taught...

I'll even accept evidence of His demonstrating what you claim during the 40 days after His resurrection. Maybe He did serve Easter Ham leftover sandwiches?

More than happy to untwist your claims about Paul and His followers as well...

As shortly after they celebrated the "jooish" Shavout (which was another "sunday" after the 50 days counted from the First Fruits "sunday" of Passover week) Luke records Acts 2:46 "With one accord they continued to meet daily in the temple courts and to break bread from house to house, sharing their meals with gladness and sincerity of heart, 47praising God and enjoying the favor of all the people."

Can you imagine His disciples having favor with da joos (da joos who literally needed Rome to police themselves as they were all to happy killing dissent and heretics) in and around the area of the temple preaching "Sabbath is done away with...His entire calander actually...oh and we can make images and even bring them to bow and serve here...He's a 3 and 1 construct...oh and we can eat pork now says One with a Greek name" LOL

As it was the disciples were arrested for merely preaching by the authority of His Name the resurrection from the dead. Acts 4:2

Still later Luke records:

Acts 5:27And when they had brought them, they set them before the council. And the high priest asked them, 28saying, “Did we not strictly command you not to teach in this name? And look, you have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this Man’s blood on us!”

29But Peter and the other apostles answered and said: “We ought to obey God rather than men. 30The God of our fathers raised up Jesus whom you murdered by hanging on a tree. 31Him God has exalted to His right hand to be Prince and Savior, to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins. 32And we are His witnesses to these things, and so also is the Holy Spirit whom God has given to those who obey Him.”

33When they heard this, they were furious and plotted to kill them.​

Exactly WHAT was their doctrine?

"We can eat pig now because Ἰησοῦς fixed our digestive tract. The pork we eat no longer goes into the heart as in the OT but now into our stomachs and is purged out into the shitter thus NOT defiling us"? LOL

You think Gamaliel would advice da joos wanting to kill them "awww shucks fellas...jus' ignore them...oh and invest in pork futures"...LOL
 

clefty

Phoron
Great. Another topic for everyone to nignore
This ain't fancy theology or clever philosophy for big brain pretty talkers and their important councils Nike.

It's just da street culture...easy enough for a child to lead...

you know the Way?...heard of it? a sect Paul was a member of

...the truth...and the life...the light...all descriptions of the Torah now made flesh for our example.

you have to take into account the impact of your claim...pork futures included

I mean EVERYBODY loves bacon right? and we all know da joos are about dat money...

what a NEW market all of Israel would be...even He knew they followed Him because of their bellies...lol

imagine the disgruntled butchers/shop owners whose skill was replaced by Greeks who know pig and dormice and what else...shrimp?

that enterprising joo with his food cart selling "hog tails"...lol...or any of this addition to the menus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pork_dishes

As to cultural impact of what you claim might I remind you of what Luke recorded?

Acts 19:23And about that time there arose a great commotion about the Way. 24For a certain man named Demetrius, a silversmith, who made silver shrines of [e]Diana, brought no small profit to the craftsmen. 25He called them together with the workers of similar occupation, and said: “Men, you know that we have our prosperity by this trade. 26Moreover you see and hear that not only at Ephesus, but throughout almost all Asia, this Paul has persuaded and turned away many people, saying that they are not gods which are made with hands. 27So not only is this trade of ours in danger of falling into disrepute, but also the temple of the great goddess Diana may be despised and [f]her magnificence destroyed, whom all Asia and the world worship.”

You mean Paul WAS NOT teaching "since He became incarnate we MUST make images ikons relics to aid even the illiterate our worship...as when we bow and serve we merely venerate our prayers go through this window to its prototype both Him and the dead mediating for us"?

So the disciples did NOT teach "well you know He ALREADY told us in the OT images were ok...so we can keep making them for church home and office"

The skilled artisans and silversmiths could easily have been employed to make images...of even the 3 and 1 construct made so popular later.

Paul himself was a tent/prayer shawl maker...bet he understood da biz of the streets

Marketing after all is part of culture...makes new traditions...

Which merely takes time to change what was formerly understood as distasteful...like eating shit...

oh and peer pressure...by authority is helpful...so time plus authority/councils add the majority...and people will eat shit...ANY ol' shit

But what else did Luke have to say about the impact of the culture Paul WAS promoting:

Acts 16:19When the girl’s owners saw that their hope of making money was gone, they seized Paul and Silas and dragged them before the authorities in the marketplace. 20 They brought them to the magistrates and said, “These men are Jews and are throwing our city into turmoil 21by promoting customs that are unlawful for us Romans to adopt or practice.” 22The crowd joined in the attack against Paul and Silas, and the magistrates ordered that they be stripped and beaten with rods.

So what customs was Paul annoying these poor Romans with? "we can eat pork now...as Ἰησοῦς fixed it so that pork now goes into the stomach and out into the shitter and not like in the OT when pork went into the heart defiling us" LOL

you know cuz even Acts 15 ruled if you kill it correctly pig is made clean...lol

no wonder not even the Muslims believed Isa taught or did that...

good luck in da streets in dis here Kulturkampf...
 
Last edited:

clefty

Phoron
So what does this New Covenant age christened to a room full of joos, signed with His blood, and SEALED with His death look like?'

The action...the praxis (πρᾶξις) as pretty talkers like to say...of the NEW COVENANT AGE begins as recorded by gentile Luke:

ACTS 1:

1The former account I made, O Theophilus,


"origin is the Greek word Θεόφιλος from θεός (theós, "God") and φιλία (philía, "love or affection") can be translated as "Love of God" or "Friend of God" Wiki interesting name...but love of WHICH god...friend of WHICH god?...we are in Roman territory after all and even Greek culture provided MANY options to love and befriend...the answer to that question is the entire point to Luke's writing his account of His Testimony and its application by His witnesses following...

of all that Jesus began both to do and teach, 2until the day in which He was taken up, after He through the Holy Spirit had given commandments to the apostles whom He had chosen,

Luke confirms he records the teaching and demonstrating of the Testator's last will and testimony PRIOR His death and then even until He was ascended.

3to whom He also presented Himself alive after His suffering by many infallible proofs, being seen by them during forty days and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God.

and again Luke's witness to events AFTER He sealed the New Covenant age at the cross...

40 days includes 5 weekends where any change might be demonstrated or taught...and NOTHING NEW...but speaking of things pertaining to the kingdom of God...a divided kingdom? Apartheid state? His house divided between pre cross post cross lifestyles? Is then then the time He secretly discloses the NEW way of worshipping and living. His mystery church?

4And being assembled together with them, He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the Promise of the Father, “which,” He said, “you have heard from Me; 5for John truly baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now.”

Pentecost was 10 days away the "jooish" festival of Shavout. Celebrated 50 days since the First Fruits festival He "ascended to My Father" which falls after the weekly Sabbath in the Passover week. The 50 days later tradition celebrated was this was the day Israel received His Law at Sinai. As Israel left Egypt without His Law but was passed over by His wrath obviously to it.

The Promise of the Father was still to come? Yes as Paul said these festivals ARE shadows of things STILL to come even after the cross. Hebrews too confirms the Law is even a shadow of GOOD things to come Hebrews 10:1 Alluding to His baptism which they all witnessed His Father's Spirit descend as a dove the Only Begotten Son told His brothers they too would receive His Spirit...Who of course WROTE the Law.

Fitting His transfer of POWER fell from heaven on His calendar date. Perfect timing for the New Covenant age. He IS a consuming fire a SPIRIT which descended merely as a flame.

6Therefore, when they had come together, they asked Him, saying, “Lord, will You at this time restore the kingdom to Israel?”

Notice what the disciples at this time understood. What they thought the promise of the Father was still to come. Not a NEW KINGDOM, not even a NEW RELIGION, but a restoration of KINGSHIP authority to Israel. You know, get rid of the Romans... Understandable as WITH HIM they would be fed, healed, resurrected from the dead even. Angels from heaven were on His side. They would RULE yo.

7And He said to them, “It is not for you to know times or seasons which the Father has put in His own authority.

His answer is about TIME...which He establishes...Remember? The Sabbatismos time of Hebrews 4:9...a memorial to Creation and its time...and of the time of liberation from Egypt. But these are times which the Father in His authority REVEALED...there is still time for the I AM to be. Heaven and earth have NOT passed away yet. His Law still is a shadow of those good things to come. A future time.


8But you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be witnesses to Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.”

Receive power to what? Overthrow Rome?

Witnesses to Him and His way as He taught and demonstrated while with them. Not a new way with new doctrines developed in councils decades or centuries to come.

And throughout the world.

Makes sense as the promise to Abraham was his were going to be a blessing to ALL nations…the “whosoever believes shall inherit”…just as when the living oracles were delivered to this Church in the wilderness at Sinai on “Pentecost” already the joos were merely 1/12 of Israel in a mixed multitude of Hebrews not of Jacob much less Joodah…

His Law again was to be delivered in the New Covenant age right on His time…written on the hearts and minds of His people Israel through His Spirit.

And for a witness to the world of Him and His ways...in both teaching and practice for the New Covenant age.
 
Last edited:

clefty

Phoron
Continuing to with the actions of His people in His New Covenant age He sealed at the cross:

40 days passed...that is 5 weekends...the silence is deafening of anything new or extraordinary happening...or taught while He was still with them.

In comparison to the thunder and lighting and BOOMING VOICE of the Old Testament's swearing "I do" at that burnin' and shakin' Mt. Sinai things around Jerusalem were quite unremarkable. Luke here doesn't record anybody talking about the earthquake or veil rent in the temple or all the risen dead...except for that One. But I'm getting ahead of myself there:

Acts 1:9Now when He had spoken these things, while they watched, He was taken up, and a cloud received Him out of their sight. 10And while they looked steadfastly toward heaven as He went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel, 11who also said, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand gazing up into heaven? This same Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will so come in like manner as you saw Him go into heaven.”

And so that is how He left it...and them...and the heavenly message was of uninterrupted continuation...a continous enduring...as this SAME Jesus will come in like manner...the timing...the person...the manner...nothing new...even heaven had TWO witnesses to the event...

12Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a Sabbath day’s journey.

Hmmm...even in the New Covenant Age Luke a Gentile...doctor...writing to another Gentile Theophilus...IN GREEK...and for a Greek audience STILL uses "jooish" measurements for distance...didn't the Greeks have their own?

13And when they had entered, they went up into the upper room where they were staying: Peter, James, John, and Andrew; Philip and Thomas; Bartholomew and Matthew; James the son of Alphaeus and Simon the Zealot; and Judas the son of James. 14These all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with His brothers.

Where they still aftraid of "da joos"? 40 days after the cross? Over a month's rent for a room big enough for 11 men women Mary and with His brothers. These brothers adelphois (from alpha (as a cop. prefix) and delphus (womb)) were either the ones already listed...or half brothers from Joseph...but wouldnt Greek have a specific term for that? Apperently not as even if Mary had children by Joseph they would also only be half brothers...as His Father's Spirit impregnated her...or did the Holy Spirit?...or the Son impregnant Himself as the Spirit comes from the Father AND the Son...but that's another thread I guess...TBD...

So what is the first order of business of this ekklesia in its NEW COVENANT AGE?

1)Replacing Judas...restoring the board members to 12 and not just 11...but WHY? Couldn't the NEW AGE be run by a NEW NUMBER? I mean it is a NEW COVENANT yes?

15And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples (altogether the number of names was about a hundred and twenty), and said, 16“Men and brethren, this Scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit spoke before by the mouth of David concerning Judas, who became a guide to those who arrested Jesus; 17for he was numbered with us and obtained a part in this ministry.”

Peter immediately appeals to precedent...to the OLD for guidance...but it's NEW Peter...you are the NEW His church is built on...

18(Now this man purchased a field with the wages of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst open in the middle and all his entrails gushed out. 19And it became known to all those dwelling in Jerusalem; so that field is called in their own language, Akel Dama, that is, Field of Blood.)

Luke here confirms he is writing in Greek NOT the language of the area as he could have just said it in Greek but here clarifies to the Greek audience that the action is NOT in Greek but in their own language...or else they would have NAMED the field in Greek.

Peter quoting the Word which became flesh:

20“For it is written in the Book of Psalms:

‘Let his dwelling place be desolate,
And let no one live in it’;
and,
‘Let another take his office.’

Psalms 69:25, 109:8

Makes sense for Peter to quote scripture from the OT since the NT had not yet been written down...

however it HAD BEEN TAUGHT...and Peter was there listening...learning

And yet Peter did not quote here from memory any NEW INSTRUCTIONS from Him Who testified His NEW Testament.

But Peter argued "so it was then declared...so it shall still be" as per Isaiah 55:11...which later he will echo this Acts 4:28They carried out what Your hand and will had decided beforehand would happen.

21“Therefore,

in the Greek it's written "It behooves therefore" so it MUST be very important to do so...odd ifALL IS NEW to rely on so much on the OLD which was done away with.

of these men who have accompanied us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, 22beginning from the baptism of John to that day when He was taken up from us, one of these must become a witness with us of His resurrection.”

Eleven was NOT enough it had to be 12. The first action of this NEW church was to restore itself to the way it was prior the cross. As it was when a ekklesia a "called out congregation" it was at Mt Sinai to receive the living oracles Acts 7:38

23And they proposed two: Joseph called Barsabas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthias. 24And they prayed and said, “You, O Lord, who know the hearts of all, show which of these two You have chosen 25to take part in this ministry and apostleship from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.” 26And they cast their lots, and the lot fell on Matthias. And he was numbered with the eleven apostles.

Why casting lots? Again precedent had been set. Already in the OT lots were cast once a year (day of atONEment) to determine which goat carrying the sins of Israel was to be killed immediately and which was to be led out of the camp into the wilderness. Divine intervention was represented as choosing which was which as not to rely on man's favoritism. His intervention was also needed as lots were cast to determine the land the tribes were to inherit. Certainly it had to be "heaven rules" when passing out inheritance and not to be corrupted by man's greed or favor.

Now what's Interesting about the 2 candidates proposed to restore Israel to 12 were their names. Surely being a NEW church the replacement would be specific and unique for the job. With a name denoting this monumental change, this upgrade, this NEW COVENANT AGE. Biblical names very often carry clues to the coming story...meaning to their context in the narrative...signs as clear as images for teaching aids...to help impress the story for future generations.

So the first candidate was named Joseph but called Barsabas and finally known by his nickname Justus. All these are translated as "Yah will add" "Son of Oath/rest/Sabbos" and "justice" but which is a Latin name. So we have someone named in Hebrew called in Aramiac known by his Latin name. What's more creedal than an oath...and son of Sabbath/sign than Sunday? known by Latin.

and then there is Matthais which translates as "gift of Yah"

So the new covenant was to be restored to the number 12 of the tribes of Israel between "He will add son of an oath/sabbath" known by Latin justice

or "gift of Yah"

The lot fell on...or more precisely "Heaven chose" the man named "Yah's gift" Who is GRACE...

and to ALL...just like it was in the OT...the "strangers within thy gates" of the Sabbath oath are included in this New Covenant age as it remains "whosoever believeth shall inherit"...

Which did "heaven" NOT choose? Any additional son of oaths recognized in Latin. As He would NOT add that.

And yet how many creeds were established and in Latin during this New Covenant age AFTER His testimony had been SEALED at the cross?
 
Top