Ukraine-Russia WAR updates

Grug Arius

Phorus Primus
Staff member
6 hours ago - 50°21′N 0°4′E

Six large landing ships of the Russian Navy is heading to the Mediterranean Sea for exercises, - the Russian Defense Ministry said​


 

Grug Arius

Phorus Primus
Staff member
Code:
https://twitter.com/zerosum24/status/1484204990898049044

follow zerosum24 if you havent already, this tweeter account is an excellent source of intel
 

Grug Arius

Phorus Primus
Staff member
This analyst believes that instead of Russia committing to a full invasion and occupation, it's planning for a punitive air campaign or rapid incursion...

this seems the most likely option IMO

A number of recent articles have suggested that the costs of a potential invasion are too high, or that the purpose of a Russian military operation in Ukraine would be to occupy territory. A better explanation of Moscow’s current actions is that they are part of a compellence campaign. If Moscow cannot convince the United States to agree to some of its demands and force Ukraine to make concessions, it may view military force as its last resort to change what it considers an unacceptable status quo. Russian behavior suggests that it believes the costs of inaction would be greater than the costs of a significant military escalation in Ukraine, particularly after reviewing the events in Ukraine over the summer and fall. Moscow’s military objectives would focus on imposing unacceptable costs on Ukraine by destroying military units, inflicting casualties, taking prisoners of war, or degrading Ukraine’s ability to defend itself. Russia could choose to seize territory to raise the costs on Kyiv, but this would likely not be the ultimate objective. Moscow could possibly achieve its objectives by unleashing Russia’s superior fires capability without an invasion or launching a short punitive raid with a planned withdrawal. These options would have fewer risks and costs than a large-scale invasion designed to occupy significantly more territory.
 

Grug Arius

Phorus Primus
Staff member

Tracking Russian deployments near Ukraine – Autumn-Winter 2021-22​

access_time15/11/2021
folder_openAnalysis
local_offerRussia, Ukraine

The purpose of this blog post is to provide an up-to-date order of battle data of Russian forces near Ukraine. Due to increased operational security and Russian attempts to hide the movements of their units, this list is unlikely to be exhaustive.
Nevertheless, I still think it is relevant to keep track of what is being moved around.
This post will be regularly updated.
As for the area coverage, I will be looking at everything that is deployed from the Smolensk Oblast to Krasnodar Krai and Crimea.
First are the units that are permanently deployed near Ukraine.
20th Combined Arms Army – Western Military District – Voronezh
236th Artillery Brigade – Kolomna
3rd Motorised Rifle Division – Valyuki
  • 252nd Motorised Rifle Regiment – Boguchar – Fully established
  • 752nd Motorised Rifle Regiment – Soloti – Fully established
  • 237th Tank Regiment – Soloti – Fully established
  • 99th SP Artillery Regiment – Boguchar – Fully established
  • Unidentified Motorised Rifle Regiment – Soloti (established in December 2021 – it can generate one BTG)
144th Motorised Rifle Division – Smolensk
  • 488th Motorised Rifle Regiment – Klintsy – Fully established
  • 856th SP Artillery Regiment – Pochep – Fully established
  • 254th Motorised Rifle Regiment – Klintsy – Tank company and an MR battalion
  • 59th Tank Regiment – Yelnya – Tank battalion, an MRC
8th Combined Arms Army – Southern Military District – Novocherkassk
20th Separate Motorised Rifle Brigade Division – Volgograd – (The unit was converted into a division in December 2021)
238th Artillery Brigade – Korenovsk – Fully established
150th Motorised Rifle Division – Persianovskiy
  • 102nd Motorised Rifle Regiment – Persianovskiy – Fully established
  • 103rd Motorised Rifle Regiment – Rostov-on-Don – Fully established
  • 68th Tank Regiment – Persianovskiy – Fully established
  • 163rd Tank Regiment – Persianovskiy – Fully established
  • 381st Artillery Regiment – Rostov-on-Don – Fully established
Crimea
  • 810th Naval Infantry Brigade – Sevastopol – Fully established
  • 126th Separate Coastal Defense Brigade – Perevalne – Fully established
  • 8th Artillery Regiment – Perevalne – Fully established
  • 56th Air Assault Regiment – Feodosia – The base is under construction
New units near Ukraine
Pogonovo
  • Three BTGs from the 4th Tank Division, 1st Guards Tank Army, Western Military District;
  • Two BTGs from the 2nd Motor Rifle Division, 1st Guards Tank Army, Western Military District;
  • A company/battalion of TOS-1A, 20th NCB Regiment, 1st Guards Tank Army, Western Military District;
  • A possible BM-27 Battalion, 288th Artillery Brigade, 1st Guards Tank Army, Western Military District;
Yelnya
  • Two BTGs from the 74th MRB;
  • Two BTGs from the 35th MRB;
  • Two BTGs from the 55th MRB;
  • A BTG from the 90th Tank Division;
  • An Iskander Battalion from the 119th Missile Brigade;
  • A TOS-1A company and assorted equipment from the 10th NCB Regiment; and
  • One artillery battalion ( 9P140 Uragan) from the 120th Artillery Brigade;
Crimea
  • Two motor rifle battalions (and a tank company) from the 136th MRB, 58th Combined Arms Army. (added 23 December);
  • There are at least additional three/four BTGs scattered across the peninsula.
Postoyalye Dvory
  • A BTG from the 138th Motor Rifle Brigade, 6th Combined Arms Army (added on 11 December);
  • A BTG from the 25th Motor Rifle Brigade, 6th Combined Arms Army (added on 14 December).
Rozhny
  • One BTG from the 90th Tank Division (added 30 December);
Klimovo
  • Two BTGs from the 90th Tank Division.
Krasnodar Krai
  • Two BTGs from the 177th Naval Infantry Regiment
Units from the Eastern Military District
  • Since the first week of January 2022, Russia has been moving its forces from the Eastern Military District to Western Russia and Belarus. The size of this deployment is significant, between 7-10perhaps as many as 15-20 BTGs. This translates to around 50% of the Eastern MD combat potential. From the start we assumed some of these BTGs will land in Belarus, which has indeed happened. Here is the list of activated units and their confirmed destination.
    • 14th Spetsnaz Brigade – ?
    • A BTG from the 114th Motor Rifle Regiment – ?
    • 14th Engineering Brigade – ?
    • 54th Command and Control Brigade – Brest (Belarus)
    • A BTG from the 36th Motor Rifle Brigade – Brest (Belarus)
    • A BTG from the 37th Motor Rifle Brigade – ?
    • Two BTGs from the 5th Tank Brigade – Rechitsa (Belarus)
    • A BTG from the 38th Motor Rifle Brigade – Yelsk (Belarus)
    • A BTG from the 64th Motor Rifle Brigade – ?
    • Two BTGs from the 155th Naval Infantry Brigade – Baranovichi (Belarus)
    • A BTG from the 11th Air Assault Brigade – ?
    • A BTG from the 83rd Air Assault Brigade – ?
    • A BTG from the 69th Covering (border protection) Brigade – Kozenki (Belarus)
    • 338th Reactive Artillery Brigade – ?
    • 165th Artillery Brigade – Rechitsa (Belarus)
    • 107th Missile Brigade – Asipovichy (Belarus)
Here is the BTG count as of 23 January. The Number after ‘+’ shows new additions.
This gives a total of 66-67 BTGs excluding DPR and LPR forces.
 

Grug Arius

Phorus Primus
Staff member
4 hours ago - 41°1′N 28°59′E

Russian Navy Project 1171 Black Sea Fleet 197th Landing Ship Brigade Tapir (NATO:Alligator) class LST Orsk 148 returned from Tartus Syria & transited Bosphorus towards the Black Sea en route to Sevastopol​

 

Petr

Administrator

Putin's Waited 30 Years to Sort Out Ukraine


BY DAVID P. GOLDMAN JAN 25, 2022 8:52 AM ET


“Ukraine’s induction into the Western alliance system would mean that the US missiles could hit Moscow in 5 minutes, rendering Russian air defence systems ineffectual and obsolete,” writes former top Indian diplomat M.K. Bhadrakumar in his blog. Since 1991, when the U.S. and Germany assured Gorbachev that NATO would NOT expand eastward if Russia agreed to German unification, Russia has believed that the West betrayed a solemn commitment by pushing NATO towards Russia’s border (this is disputed by most U.S. sources).

Russia thinks in terms of firepower and facts on the ground. Putin has spent the past dozen years turning Russia’s armed forces into a well-armed, efficient instrument (it took less than 24 hours to put Russia’s 6th Airborne into Kazakhstan and just three days to kill everyone who didn’t like it). He’s lurked in the tall grass waiting for an opportunity to settle accounts.

Why now? Because he can. U.S. sanctions mean less than they did in the past because China wants as much overland energy supply as it can get (in a scrap, the U.S. Navy could interdict tanker supply from the Persian Gulf). China and Russia are joined at the hip in high-tech (Huawei has a huge presence there). The specter of a Russian-Chinese alliance spooks the West, with good reason.

The Europeans don’t want a fight with Russia. When Germany’s equivalent of the secretary of the Navy, Admiral Schoenbach, said last week that Putin “deserves respect,” he was forced to resign, but he spoke for the overwhelming majority of Germans.

NATO is weak, China is ascendant, and the U.S. is confused; Russia is well-armed and prepared. That’s why Putin is making his move now.

The liberal internationalists in the Biden administration want to continue the Clintonian folly of expanding NATO to include countries that we can’t defend. Three years ago Prof. Walter McDougall of the University of Pennsylvania excoriated this exercise. Why do we do this? To defend the brave little democracy in Ukraine against totalitarian oppression? Puh-leeze. The Kiev kleptocracy is an embarrassment to itself as well as everyone else. Since the Soviet Union fell, the White Whale of the liberal internationalists (like Antony Blinken) and neocons (like Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland) has been to export democracy to Russia. The regime-change fantasy has dominated U.S. policy since we sponsored the 2004 “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine, through the 2014 Maidan Square coup.

Washington consistently underestimated Putin, who bided his time and waited for the opportunity to settle accounts — which is now here. There are still conservatives, e.g., the estimable Conrad Black, who imagine that we can pursue NATO expansion and avoid a scrap with Russia. There are others who insist that Russia can’t ally with China because China will absorb its territory. This is whistling in the dark.

There’s a simple way to back away from the brink: We agree with Putin that Ukraine won’t join NATO, and Putin agrees to keep his hands off. An incursion into Ukraine would cost him plenty (not just economic sanctions, but the political cost of a war between parties with extensive intermarriage and family ties). And Putin has already wanted to look West rather than to China.

China meanwhile is watching this unfold with a bucket of popcorn. From guancha.cn (hawkish website close to the State Council): “Everyone is studying the experience of history. The United States is studying how to avoid the decline of empires, China is studying how to avoid Thucydides’ trap. Russia is studying how to plug leaks. And Europe is studying how to eat melons. What is Ukraine studying? The most important thing to study is the historical experience of neighboring Poland.” Of course, guancha.cn is referring to the repeated partition of Poland.

I make no excuses for Putin. But it’s worth asking when Russia has ever been governed by the sort of enlightened liberal that our Wilsonians and neo-cons prefer. No-one in Russia talks about Ivan the Reasonable. Russia’s tragedy is not ours to fix.
 
Top