Why Extreme Antisemitism is a Right Wing Deviation

If you don't critique capitalism, you need some other way to explain why the elites of society act completely out of step with the interests of the average person ... and the way people do that is by saying Jews control the elites. Captain Marinesko basically agreed with this part.

Also, Pro-whites need a way to explain why Whites act in ways that don't align with Salter's theory of ethnic nepotism. They explain this through the Jewish question instead of understanding human greed. Having written this I am not a white nationalist and believe various racial groups can co-exist in the same nation.

While extreme antisemitism is a deviation, this doesn't mean anyone is above criticism. The days where I praise Jews as basically the chosen people are over.
 
The thing is that most people who start off as pro-whites who disagree with extreme antisemitism eventually end up rejecting white nationalism too. They either shift to the left or they shift to the mainstream. Once antisemitism is dispensed of, Frank Salter usually goes next.
 
It is the opposite of mild antisemitism. I'm not saying Jews should never be critiqued at all, but there reaches a point where Jews became a scapegoat. They became an easy explanation for Gentile behaviors when the truth is that people are responsible for their own behaviors.
 
I don't think anyone who understands the Jewish agenda and their basic set of behaviors tries to blame gentile behavior on them. We are all indeed responsible for our own behavior but Jews have historically and contemporaneously proven to exert a noxious and corrosive influence upon any society where they gain significant power. History is replete with undeniable examples. The notion they have been scapegoated for no reason whatsoever simply does not stand up to any honest or rational discussion. This is why Jews have always spearheaded censorship and hate speech laws whenever a significant amount of goyim cattle start to catch onto the game that is being played. The very term extreme anti-semitism is a canard and a loaded term, which is why I questioned it in the beginning of this discussion.

Also, I disagree with your premise that so called anti-semitism is a product of the right. The old school left and populists were aware and reticent of Jewish banking and corporate power as well. One could easily make the argument that the NSDAP came from the left, not the right. The bottom line is that nobody wants to be ruled or heavily influenced by a tiny minority whose thinking is essentially alien to their own society and cultural values.
 
Last edited:

Gawn Chippin

Arachnocronymic Metaphoron
A Fifth Column minority cannot gain power, without collaborators:

iu
iu


Meanwhile, that minority holds power, through illusion:

iu
 

Petr

Administrator
If you don't critique capitalism, you need some other way to explain why the elites of society act completely out of step with the interests of the average person ... and the way people do that is by saying Jews control the elites. Captain Marinesko basically agreed with this part.

I also remember "Captain Marinesko". He was mostly just a rabulist Red larper, but some of the things he said stuck to my mind. For example, he mocked neo-Nazis this way:

"Sorry guys, the big business has gone globalist and therefore sponsorship money is not coming to you. Fat-cat capitalists no longer need you militant nationalist types to serve as muscle against the Communist threat."

This unkind but, alas, uncomfortably accurate comment drew attention to the importance of patronage (the favourite topic of the reactionary thinker Bertrand de Jouvenel). The original Nazis managed to get the support of Big Business behind them (but mostly only after they had grown big and strong enough, thus "proving themselves"), whereas hapless little neo-Nazi organizations did not have any kind institutional support. Thus the former succeeded and the latter did not.

 
Last edited:

Petr

Administrator
WNs must not be necessarily "anti-capitalist," in a Communist manner, but they certainly need to be "capitalism-critical" at least. For are not the plutocrats - Jews and gentiles alike - shitting on them all the time?

The WN rock band Skrewdriver had this song that illustrated how the cops who work for "moneymen" are keeping the nationalists/nativists down:


this little piggy went to the market,
this little piggy to the fair,
this little piggy wore a big blue hat and he followed us everywhere
where ever we go so does he, in his little car
if he works well for the moneymen, well he knows that he'll go far
...
a bigger piggy had a lot of cash he gained from certain things,
poured into his bank account by the men who pull his strings
the biggest piggy didn't like his own land, he loved to see it die
and that's why patriots are banned from flying their flags high
 
The opposite of extreme anti-semitism is extreme philo-semitism. Speaking of commissar semantics did you guys gno about the political teaching surrounding the use of anti-semitism vs antisemitism? Because the former implies the existence of a stand alone semitism which provokes the question "What is semitism?" And going down that rabbit hole could be anti-semitic.
 
Top