WN and Far Right Follies (constructive self-criticism and pro-White internal debate)

[Petr]

Here we have a good example of a pig-headed Far Right fellow who just refuses to understand the importance of properly documenting your claims - no, it is not enough to say that "that is what Trudeau could have said!"

Those dumb anti-Semites who say that "what does it matter if the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is authentic or not, we can see it is spiritually true!" are doing the same thing.

One may get short-term propaganda victories by making these kind of false claims, but at the cost of losing your long-term credibility.

 

[Mike]

As William Pierce once realistically put it (paraphrasing): We have to tell the truth, because unlike our foe, we are not in any position to make our lies stick.

 

[Petr]

As William Pierce once realistically put it (paraphrasing): We have to tell the truth, because unlike our foe, we are not in any position to make our lies stick.

Yes, that is the cynical Hobbesian "might makes right" reality: only the stronger party can afford itself the luxury of making up bullshit claims. The weaker ones get ruthlessly exposed when they try to imitate that tactic. Only the strong, hegemonic powers can pull off lie-propaganda (and even they can easily fail at it).

This, of course, aside from the whole ethical point of view.

 

[Petr]

Is Karlin being non-ironic here? If so, he is showing his downward slide, and giving further evidence that like Richard Spencer, he is ultimately just a "racist liberal," who likes modernist progressive rot just as long as it does not touch his own pet subjects:

 

[Petr]

But this quip of Karlin actually has a lot of truth in it - when formerly conventional-minded, normie people get suddenly exposed to forbidden truths, their whole worldview can collapse, and they can start behaving in an erratic, unstable manner after they feel that "my whole life has been a lie":

 

[Mike]

Musk said "You have said the actual truth" in response to The Artist Formerly Known as Eric:

Okay.

Jewish communties have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them.

I'm deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest shit now about western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much.

You want truth said to your face, there it is.

In reply to Musk, Karlin says 'Beware of boomers getting "based"' ?? I don't get it. Who is this Karlin person, what exactly is he referring to, and why is he trying to pour a bucket of water on Musk? What is the "WN and far right folly" being presented here? When's the last time the owner of a huge Internet site spoke in such in candid manner, or at all, about Jewish hypocrisy? Elon Musk's statement seems 100% like a W and not an L to me, but maybe I am missing something.

 

[Petr]

 

[Petr]

 

[Petr]

I remember that Eric Striker did actually call Pinochet a tool of Judeo-plutocracy, and gave a distinct impression that he preferred Hugo Chavez to him. Sheer Strasserism (left-wing Nazism).

 

[Petr]

 

[Petr]

More on this kind of third-worldist anti-Zionism:

 

[Petr]

The Jewish Bolsheviks in Russia were not "Zionists," for example:

 

[Petr]

This is what low-IQ anti-Semitism looks like:

 

[Petr]

Cofnas seems to be the kind of Jew who seeks to respond to Alt Right dissidents on their own terms - and indeed, trying to deny the Jewish intellectual talents is rather pointless sour-graping; the way Jews began to shoot up socially right after being emancipated from ghettoes (and the grip of rabbinical tyranny, that the Hasidim are still living under) is hard empirical evidence of their high IQ:

 

[Petr]

Anyways, Dick Spencer is again on with his impeccable bad timing:

I started this thread with this post.

But now it seems that Anatoly Karlin has himself followed in Dick Spencer's footsteps, apparently dropping the whole nationalist-traditionalist cause and essentially turning into mere selfish "Libertarian" individualist, who spends his days idly, predicting soon-to-come radical techno-revolution and making cynical, jaded quips about his former comrades.

It would seem that his mind just broke with those successful Ukro counter-attacks last year, he allowed dooming despair to swallow him, and then he began to act as if he no longer cared about that whole parochial nationalism thing anymore, being more interested in futuristic techno-utopianism.








It is as if Karlin had literally degenerated from the lower image here to the upper image!

 

[Petr]

 

[Petr]

EXCEPT for his take on the Jewish Question, there has never been anything very "edgy" about E. Michael Jones. He has specialized also in Trad-Cat condemnation of modernist sexual corruption (on which issue he is indeed quite great). But besides his lame views on race, I do not know whether he has ever supported "Fascist" views - even RC Fascists like Francisco Franco. He has never seemed very reactionary-minded or monarchist to me - like the medieval Guelfs, he may be OK with democracy just as long as it respects Catholicism.

(G.K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc too were "Catholic Jacobin" types that defended the French Revolution - EMJ may be close to their position.)

 

[Petr]

 

[Buglord]

EXCEPT for his take on the Jewish Question, there has never been anything very "edgy" about E. Michael Jones. He has specialized also in Trad-Cat condemnation of modernist sexual corruption (on which issue he is indeed quite great). But besides his lame views on race, I do not know whether he has ever supported "Fascist" views - even RC Fascists like Francisco Franco. He has never seemed very reactionary-minded or monarchist to me - like the medieval Guelfs, he may be OK with democracy just as long as it respects Catholicism.

(G.K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc too were "Catholic Jacobin" types that defended the French Revolution - EMJ may be close to their position.)

Frankly if a subsaharan can speak Polish, is Catholic and perhaps pickles cucumbers on the weekends he would certainly be trying to be Polish. That's not really the problem if an African is trying to assimilate. It would be the one who does absolutely nothing, learns no language and does not attempt to become part of the polity and expects to be considered Polish.

 

[surenot]

Here we have a good example of a pig-headed Far Right fellow who just refuses to understand the importance of properly documenting your claims - no, it is not enough to say that "that is what Trudeau could have said!"

Those dumb anti-Semites who say that "what does it matter if the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is authentic or not, we can see it is spiritually true!" are doing the same thing.

One may get short-term propaganda victories by making these kind of false claims, but at the cost of losing your long-term credibility.

What he did say was that Canada is a post national state and that 'new Canadians'are moar Canadian than old stock ones because they chose to come here.